Minggu, 07 April 2019

To stop copycats, Snapchat shares itself - TechCrunch

Evan Spiegel has finally found a way to fight back against Mark Zuckerberg’s army of clones. For 2.5 years, Snapchat foolishly tried to take the high road versus Facebook, with Spiegel claiming “Our values are hard to copy”. That inaction allowed Zuckerberg to accrue over 1 billion daily Stories users across Instagram, WhatsApp, and Facebook compared to Snapchat’s 186 million total daily users. Meanwhile, the whole tech industry scrambled to build knock-offs of Snap’s vision of an ephemeral, visual future.

But Snapchat’s new strategy is a rallying call for the rest of the social web that’s scared of being squashed beneath Facebook’s boot. It rearranges the adage of “if you can’t beat them, join them” into “to beat them, join us”. As a unified front, Snap’s partners get the infrastructure they need to focus on what differentiates them, while Snapchat gains the reach and entrenchment necessary to weather the war.

Tinder lets you use Snapchat Stories as profile photos

Snapchat’s plan is to let other apps embed the best parts of it rather than building their own half-rate copies.

Why reinvent the wheel of Stories, Bitmoji, and ads when you can reuse the original? A high-ranking Snap executive told me on background that this is indeed the strategy. If it’s going to invent these products, and others want something similar, it’s smarter to enable and partly control the Snapchatification than to try to ignore it. Otherwise, Facebook might be the one to platform-tize what Snap inspired everyone to want.

The “Camera company” corrected course and took back control of its destiny this week at its first ever Snap Partner Summit in its hometown of Los Angeles. Now it’s a camera platform thanks to Snap Kit. Its new Story Kit will implant Snapchat Stories into other apps later this year. They can display a more traditional carousel of your friends’ Stories, or lace them into their app in a custom format. Houseparty’s Stories carousel shares what your buddies are up to outside of the group video chat app. Tinder will let you show off your Snapchat Story alongside your photos to seduce potential matches. But the camera stays inside Snapchat, with new options to share out to these App Stories.

Snap CEO Evan Spiegel presents at the Snap Partner Summit

This is how Snapchat colonizes the native app ecosystem similarly to how Facebook invaded the web with the Like button. Snap’s strong privacy record makes these partners willing to host it where now they might fear that Facebook and its history with Cambridge Analytica could tarnish their brand.

Instead of watching these other apps spin up mini competitors that further fragment the Stories world, Snap saves developers the slow and costly hassle while instantly giving them best-in-class tools to boost their own engagement. Each outpost makes your Snapchat account a little more indispensable, grants its camera new utility, and reminds you to visit again. It’s another reason to stick with Snap rather than straying to other versions of Stories.

If Spiegel knows what’s up, he’ll douse the Story Kit partnerships team with resources so they can sign up as many apps as possible before Facebook can copy this idea too. For now, Snap isn’t injecting ads into App Stories, but it could easily do so and split the cash with its host. This would attract partners, generate revenue, and give Snap’s advertisers more reach.

Houseparty embeds Snapchat Stories

Either way, Snap will score those benefits with its new Ad Kit. Later this year the Snapchat Audience Network will launch allowing partners to host Snap’s full-screen vertical video ads and earn an as-yet-undisclosed revenue share. They won’t have to build up an ad sales force or build an auction and delivery system, but just drop in an SDK to start displaying ads to both Snapchat users and non-users. The company’s message again is that it’s becoming easier to cooperate with Snapchat than copy it.

Snap’s new ad network

Giving its advertisers more reach and reusability for Snap’s somewhat proprietary ad unit format helps Snap address its core challenge: scale. Snap’s 186 million total users can look small in comparison to Instagram, Facebook, or YouTube, especially since that count sank in Q2 and Q3 before stabilzing in Q4 of last year. That makes it tougher for advertisers to justify the chore of spending on Snapchat. Ad Kit and potentially Story Kit give Snap more reach even without user growth.

Added size could tip the cards in Snap’s favor given it’s already popular with an extremely important demographic. Snapchat now reaches 75 percent of 13 to 34-year olds in the US, and 90 percent of 13 to 24-year olds there. It claims to now reach more of that younger age group than Facebook in the most lucrative countries: the US, Canada, UK, France, and Australia.

Facebook has massively neglected this segment. Case in point: Facebook Messenger’s Stickers feature that’s popular with kids has hardly improved since its launch in 2013, which I hear was a fight to get approved internally. Meanwhile, Snapchat keeps growing its lead on virtual identity with Bitmoji. Now Snap will let you put your personalized Bitmoji avatar on your FitBit smart watch face, use them to joke about Venmo purchases, and even represent yourself with one in Snap’s new multiplayer games platform.

Again, Snap wants partners to integrate the real thing rather than try to build some half-assed facsimile of Bitmoji. Surprisingly, Facebook’s Avatars have been mired in development for over a year and Apple’s Memoji can’t escape iMessage and FaceTime yet. That’s why Snapchat would be wise to double-down on trying to make Bitmoji the ubiquitous way to represent yourself without a photograph. Facebook’s lack of design cool and Bitmoji’s massive headstart with this differentiated product is a powerful way for Snap to wedge itself into partnerships.

Snap needs all the help it can get if the underdog is going to carve out a substantial and sustainable piece of social networking. Teaming up was the theme of the rest of the Snap Partner Summit. It’s built ways for Netflix, GoFundMe, VSCO, and Anchor to share stickers and for publishers like the Washington Post to share articles back to Snapchat. It’s got Zynga and ZeptoLab building real-time multiplayer Snap Games that live inside chat and are a clever way of slipping ads into messaging.

Snapchat’s new Scan augmented reality utility platform has signed up Giphy and Photomath as well as former partners Shazam and Amazon to let you squeeze extra interactivity out of your surroundings. And since the physical world is too vast for any one developer to fill with AR experiences, Snap beefed up its Lens Studio platform with new templates and creator profiles so developers add to its warchest of 400,000 special effects. Facebook may be able to clone Snap’s features, but not its developer army.

“If we can show the right Lens in the right moment, we can inspire a whole new world of creativity” says Snap co-founder Bobby Murphy . From partnerships to utilities to toys, all the new announcements drive attention back to Snapchat’s camera. That makes it ripe to become the augmented reality brower of the world.

It all feels like a coming of age moment for Snapchat, punctuated by the glitzy press event where media bigwigs gnoshed on Chinese steak buns and played with AR art installations in West Hollywood.

Spiegel has discovered a method of capitalizing on his penchant for inspiring mobile product design. With this strategy in place and Snap’s reengineered Android app and new languages rolling out now, I believe Snapchat will grow again, at least in terms of deeper engagement if not also total user count. Perhaps it will need a little bit more funding to get it over the hurdle, but I expect it will reach profitability before the end of 2020. 

During a pre-event press briefing with a dozen Snap executives including Spiegel and Murphy (that was on ‘background’ so we can’t quote or specify who said what), one Snap higher-up joked that Facebook has been copying it for seven years so it’s started to feel normal. Zuckerberg recently declared he wanted to reorient Facebook around privacy, ephemerality, and messaging — the core tenets of Snapchat. But a Snap leader used some colorful language to describe how they don’t care what Facebook says its philosophy is until it fixes the 2 billion-user product that keeps doing harm.

Subtly throwing shade from the stage, Spiegel concluded that “Our camera lets the natural light from our world penetrate the darkness of the Internet . . . as we use the Internet more and more in our daily lives, we need a way to make it a bit more human.” That apparently means making other apps a bit more Snapchat.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://techcrunch.com/2019/04/07/rise-of-the-snapchat-empire/

2019-04-07 19:01:47Z
52780261238652

Netflix disabled AirPlay because it isn't being told what device is getting the stream - AppleInsider

  Netflix has elaborated on the "technical reasons" why it has disabled AirPlay, and claims that since it can't tell what device the stream is being sent to because of changes in the protocol, it won't allow the feature.


Netflix debuted AirPlay support in 2013.

In a statement to AppleInsider and other venues, Netflix is blaming the removal of the feature on Apple, and it allowing AirPlay on third-party televisions.

We want to make sure our members have a great Netflix experience on any device they use. With AirPlay support rolling out to third-party devices, there isn't a way for us to distinguish between devices —what is an Apple TV versus what isn't —or certify these experiences.

Therefore, we have decided to discontinue Netflix AirPlay support to ensure our standard of quality for viewing is being met. Members can continue to access Netflix on the built-in app across Apple TV and other devices.

At present, it isn't clear what Netflix gains by knowing what television is being used, other than data harvesting. It also isn't clear what the company being unable to "certify these experiences" means, from a technical standpoint.

Netflix has made it clear that apps on iOS and Apple TV are unaffected for native playback on the device that they are installed on. However, going forward, users won't be able to use AirPlay to stream the content to another device.

The change in app policy was spotted on Friday in an update to the official Netflix Help Center webpage, which now instructs iOS device users to connect to a TV using Chromecast functionality in the television, Netflix 2nd Screen, or a physical cable. Customers attempting to stream video content to an Apple TV or AirPlay-compatible device are now met with an error message.

At CES 2019, Samsung, Sony and Vizio each revealed upcoming TV hardware support for Apple's streaming protocol in separate announcements. Korean tech giant LG followed suit in March.

Netflix's AirPlay withdrawal hit just two days after Vizio launched a beta version of its SmartCast 3 software with support for both AirPlay 2 and HomeKit.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://appleinsider.com/articles/19/04/07/netflix-disabled-airplay-because-it-isnt-being-told-what-device-is-getting-the-stream-anymore

2019-04-07 13:42:00Z
52780262187270

Shockingly Good Smartphones You Can Get for $350 or Less - The Wall Street Journal

It’s become an unwritten but unbreakable rule: Great phones cost $1,000. A few years ago, when we were paying $200 with a two-year contract, that seemed preposterous. Now you’re either renting an iPhone XS for $42 a month or dropping 10 Benjamins on Day One.

I’ve long recommended that people buy the most expensive phone they can afford. Your phone is likely your most important device, and it’s worth investing in. Recently, though, a generation of far cheaper phones hit the market offering a shockingly similar experience. These devices cost $350 or less, some as little as $150. They offer great performance, good battery life, attractive design and even some unique features of their own.

There are plenty of good phones for under $350; our three favorites are, from left, the Nokia 7.1 from HMD Global, Xiaomi’s Pocophone F1 and the Motorola Moto G7 from Lenovo. Photo: Emily Prapuolenis/The Wall Street Journal

Buying a phone this cheap used to be like buying your clothes at a thrift store; anything that sort of fit and didn’t have noticeable holes or stink was a minor miracle. Now it’s like buying last year’s fashions—not the sharpest out there, but darn close. I bet you won’t notice the difference. Except for the extra weight of all the money still in your pocket.

Getting What You Pay for

All phones have most things in common, from the processor to the memory to the tiny screws that connect them all. Yet the cost to make a phone can vary widely. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1, one of the phones I tested, costs $216.70 for all the parts and labor, according to analysis firm IHS Markit . The iPhone XS Max costs $388.37. But you can buy the F1 for $300. Apple sells its largest model for almost three times what it costs to make.

When you buy a Galaxy or an iPhone or a Pixel, you are paying for not only the very best screens and cameras, but also expensive ad campaigns, huge corporate headquarters and expansive retail stores.

The Moto G7 is the latest in a long line of good inexpensive smartphones; Motorola is one of the few hardware companies that actually make Android better. Photo: Emily Prapuolenis/The Wall Street Journal

I discussed this with Sammy Ohev-Zion, chief executive of Blu Electronics, maker of a passably decent $150 smartphone. How much would he charge for a phone with the best components he could get his hands on—the best LCD screen, the best camera, the best fingerprint reader? He said $400. In fact, he plans to launch such a phone later this year.

At the same time, even with no expense spared, Blu couldn’t make a phone as good as the Galaxy S10 or iPhone XS, Mr. Ohev-Zion cautioned. “The trade-off, of course, is that we don’t have the engineering capabilities of a Samsung or an Apple, and we never will.” Samsung’s famous OLED displays are reserved for Samsung—and Apple. Meanwhile, Apple has a lock on chips, facial-recognition systems and other tech it isn’t about to share with competitors.

Even more important, expensive phones help fund large software teams, which can build features like voice assistants and pro-grade camera tools. These phones also typically get software updates much more quickly and tend to receive updates for more years. “We’re able to get the same camera, the same hardware components,” Mr. Ohev-Zion said. “But fine-tuning it… costs you tremendous amounts of money.”

Want a phone that looks like the iPhone for a third of the price? That would be the $350 Nokia 7.1, with its elegant metal body and gold accents. Photo: Emily Prapuolenis/The Wall Street Journal

So, yes, you do still get what you pay for. There is no $300 phone that equals a device three times its price. But for years, cheap phones were bad phones. Now, the best ones come with only minor trade-offs: A few of the models I tested used older MicroUSB chargers instead of the future-looking USB-C, for instance, and none was waterproof.

For the basics—phone calls, texting, Spotify streaming, web browsing, maybe a little Candy Crush—the best cheap phones do just fine. They have multiple cameras for all your photo needs, and plenty of power and storage to keep things humming. Besides, there’s a bonus: Every cheap phone I tested has a headphone jack. Your $1,000 can’t buy that anymore.

A Steal at Any Price

I tested eight cheap phones, ranging from the $150 Blu Vivo XL4 to the $350 Nokia 7.1. All eight scored as totally usable phones, and I found three I’d recommend to almost anyone.

Few $300 phones have cameras that can stand up to more expensive devices; Xiaomi’s Pocophone F1 takes photos and videos on par with almost any phone at any price. Photo: Emily Prapuolenis/The Wall Street Journal

Overall, my favorite cheap phone is the Nokia 7.1, from HMD Global. The metal-and-glass device looks far better than you’d expect for the price, with clean lines and gold accents. Its camera captures good pictures and video, the 5.8-inch screen looks sharp and accurate, and the battery lasts all day without issue.

Best of all, the 7.1 runs Android One, a specific branch of the Android operating system that’s perfect for this kind of phone. It’s effectively stock Android, unmarred by the manufacturer, and comes with the promise of at least two years of updates. As a result, the 7.1 has no ugly bloatware or weird interface ideas. It just runs Android, and does it well.

Newsletter Sign-up

Lenovo-owned Motorola is one of the few cheap-phone makers to actually improve on the Android experience. The Moto G7 is the company’s latest inexpensive device, and at $300 it’s another solid overall smartphone. Its built-in Moto Actions app offers a number of nifty innovations, like a way to quickly access the camera by twisting your phone in your hand twice. You can answer calls just by picking up your phone, or shut the phone up just by flipping it over.

Though cameras on most cheap phones can’t keep up with the ones in the Galaxy or iPhone lineups, one exception stood out: Xiaomi’s $300 Pocophone F1. Its camera captures soft-background portrait shots, fires off HDR shots with ease, and even offers granular control over every aspect of the shot. It falls behind the best smartphone cameras in low lighting, but I trusted it completely in almost any other situation.

Can you spot the difference between the $1,000 phone and the $350 phone? Hint: The cheaper one still has a headphone jack. Photo: Emily Prapuolenis/The Wall Street Journal

After testing these smartphones, I’ve come to see the smartphone industry as divided in two. There are the Casual Phones, which trade a fraction of a phone’s power for a large fraction of its cost. And there are the Luxury Phones, $1,000-and-up devices with all the latest tech for those on the cutting edge. (Oh, and get ready for a third: the Couture Phones, foldable models priced at $2,000 or more.)

For most users, casual phones are a really good deal. If you’re worried about keeping up appearances, take all that money you saved and buy a cool handbag or some sweet new shoes. Now that’s fancy.

——For more WSJ Technology analysis, reviews, advice and headlines, sign up for our weekly newsletter. And don’t forget to subscribe to our Instant Message podcast.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.wsj.com/articles/shockingly-good-smartphones-you-can-get-for-350-or-less-11554642180

2019-04-07 13:03:00Z
CAIiEEJ7pwVfQ4HqjL-NhxXa9fkqGAgEKg8IACoHCAow1tzJATDnyxUw-aS0AQ

Top iPhone, Android apps for blocking robocalls - Fox News

Major carriers and app developers are ramping up their tactics for tackling robocalls on the iPhone and Android devices.

Some 5.51 billion robocalls were made in March 2019 in the US, according to data from a tracker published by Robokiller, a company that offers a robocall blocking app. “That's nearly 22 spam calls for every person,” Robokiller says.

Here are some of the best apps from carriers and app vendors – both free and paid as of spring 2019.

Verizon: Late last month Verizon rolled out a free robocall blocking app, which, among other features, offers spam detection and a spam filter.

THE 7 TECHNOLOGICAL WONDERS OF THE 21ST CENTURY

Verizon had already been offering a paid version for $2.99 per month. The paid app offers additional features such as Caller ID and a personal block list.

“Customers can choose to take advantage of the free solution or opt in to the enhanced caller name identification tools and spam lookup as part of the premium option,” a Verizon spokesperson told Fox News.

AT&T: The major carrier offers both a free app and a version that costs $3.99 per month. The free version blocks calls from suspected fraudsters, flags spam calls, and offers a personal block list.

The paid app adds features such as more detailed Caller ID reports and the ability to send unwanted calls to voicemail and block calls by entire categories.

HACKERS CAN TAKE OVER HEART DEVICES, DHS WARNS

Like other carriers, AT&T has “in-network systems that already label or block billions of unwanted or illegal robocalls,” an AT&T spokesperson told Fox News in an email.

The next plan of attack: STIR/SHAKEN

Verizon, AT&T and other carriers also working on a new authentication technology called STIR/SHAKEN (STIR stands for Secure Telephone Identity Revisited and SHAKEN for Signature-based Handling of Asserted information using toKENs.)

This tech will help consumers verify if an incoming call is really coming from the number listed on the caller ID display.

“While authentication won’t solve the problem of unwanted robocalls by itself, it is a key step toward giving customers greater … control over the calls they receive,” AT&T and Comcast said in a joint announcement last month.

WE'RE ALREADY IN THE MIDDLE OF A MAJOR CYBER WAR, EXPERTS BELIEVE

Other apps

Robokiller, Hiya, and Nomorobo are all robocall blocking apps for the iPhone and Android.

These apps offer the basic essentials such as advanced Caller ID, the ability to block calls that are “spoofed” to look like they are coming from a local number, and personal block lists. The apps typically offer a free trial period then ask for a small monthly fee.

Robokiller, for example, offers a personal list of allowed and blocked callers and so-called “Answer Bots,” which gives robocallers/telemarketers a “taste of their own medicine.”

Hiya, another app provider, has partnered with carriers and phone makers so it brings that experience to the table. For example, Samsung Smart Call has been powered by Hiya Client.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Nomorobo has been around a long time and received plenty of accolades in the past. So this app is also worth a try.

Free "nuclear" option

Typically with these apps, some robocalls will still get through. So, a free way to stop robocalls cold is to turn on the “Do Not Disturb” feature on the iPhone or Android. But make sure contacts are excepted. In other words, toggle on "Allow Calls From All Contacts" (iPhone) when you use Do Not Disturb so calls from family, friends, and business contacts get through.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.foxnews.com/tech/top-iphone-android-apps-for-blocking-robocalls

2019-04-07 11:03:47Z
52780262740674

Meet the tyre sculptor of Lagos - BBC News

His artwork, which is driven by a desire to clean up Lagos, is gaining popularity in Nigeria.

This video has been optimised for mobile viewing on the BBC News app. The BBC News app is available from the Apple App Store for iPhone and Google Play Store for Android.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.bbc.com/news/av/world-africa-47836943/meet-the-tyre-sculptor-of-lagos

2019-04-07 03:38:51Z
52780262740674

Sabtu, 06 April 2019

US Army shows how it will use HoloLens in the field - Engadget

US Army

When Microsoft employees balked at the company's $479 million HoloLens contract with the US Army, it raised a question: just what would this system look like? You now have a better idea. The Army has given CNBC an early demo of its Integrated Visual Augmentation System, which uses a modified HoloLens 2 to provide both combat assistance and training. It reportedly feels like a "real-life game of Call of Duty" -- you can see your squad's positions on a map, a compass, and even your weapon's reticle. Thermal imaging would help you see in the dark without as much of a telltale glow as existing night vision headsets.

In training, IVAS can also provide data to improve performance, such as a wearer's gaze and heart rate. Instructors could coach soldiers on their aim or room-clearing techniques, for instance.

The existing HoloLens 2 is currently too big to work with existing helmets. However, one Army leader expected a sunglasses-sized unit inside of six months. We wouldn't count on that (it'd likely involve moving many components to outside the helmet or the soldier's body), but development on IVAS has only been going on for a few months. "Thousands and thousands" of soldiers could be using IVAS by 2022 and 2023, Under Secretary of the Army Ryan McCarthy said, with a wider deployment by 2028.

The demo was clearly meant to sell people on the concept and allay the concerns of those who see this as twisting peaceful technology into a destructive tool. Unsurprisingly, McCarthy doesn't perceive it that way -- he argued to CNBC that the improved battlefield awareness could minimize civilian casualties. One of the soldiers involved in the test also said this really amounted to consolidating "multiple systems" that can only handle some of what IVAS does. Microsoft isn't likely to shy away from defending the contract, then.

However, this doesn't really change some of the core objections from Microsoft's staff and other critics. Part of their issue is simply that Microsoft committed to a military project without any input. The showcase may take some of the sinister edge off the technology, but it's not going to give workers a say.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.engadget.com/2019/04/06/us-army-shows-hololens-use/

2019-04-07 01:55:33Z
52780262336267

US Army shows how it will use HoloLens in the field - Engadget

US Army

When Microsoft employees balked at the company's $479 million HoloLens contract with the US Army, it raised a question: just what would this system look like? You now have a better idea. The Army has given CNBC an early demo of its Integrated Visual Augmentation System, which uses a modified HoloLens 2 to provide both combat assistance and training. It reportedly feels like a "real-life game of Call of Duty" -- you can see your squad's positions on a map, a compass, and even your weapon's reticle. Thermal imaging would help you see in the dark without as much of a telltale glow as existing night vision headsets.

In training, IVAS can also provide data to improve performance, such as a wearer's gaze and heart rate. Instructors could coach soldiers on their aim or room-clearing techniques, for instance.

The existing HoloLens 2 is currently too big to work with existing helmets. However, one Army leader expected a sunglasses-sized unit inside of six months. We wouldn't count on that (it'd likely involve moving many components to outside the helmet or the soldier's body), but development on IVAS has only been going on for a few months. "Thousands and thousands" of soldiers could be using IVAS by 2022 and 2023, Under Secretary of the Army Ryan McCarthy said, with a wider deployment by 2028.

The demo was clearly meant to sell people on the concept and allay the concerns of those who see this as twisting peaceful technology into a destructive tool. Unsurprisingly, McCarthy doesn't perceive it that way -- he argued to CNBC that the improved battlefield awareness could minimize civilian casualties. One of the soldiers involved in the test also said this really amounted to consolidating "multiple systems" that can only handle some of what IVAS does. Microsoft isn't likely to shy away from defending the contract, then.

However, this doesn't really change some of the core objections from Microsoft's staff and other critics. Part of their issue is simply that Microsoft committed to a military project without any input. The showcase may take some of the sinister edge off the technology, but it's not going to give workers a say.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.engadget.com/2019/04/06/us-army-shows-hololens-use/

2019-04-07 01:05:05Z
52780262336267