Selasa, 16 April 2019

Do You Run and Listen to Spotify? This Is the Smartwatch You Should Buy - Gear Patrol

The Samsung Galaxy Watch Active ($200+) is a smaller, lighter, less expensive and more fitness-focused (hence the “active”) version of the company’s smartwatch from last year, the Galaxy Watch ($300+). It’s designed to work best with any of the latest Samsung and Android smartphones, like the new Galaxy S10, and its ecosystem of apps, but you can still use it with an iPhone — which is what I did. I tested the smartwatch for three weeks to see if it could keep up with my lifestyle.

The Galaxy Watch Active was able to track my workouts, walking minutes and stressed out minutes. Samsung is one of a few smartwatch makers with a partnership with Spotify, so, as a Spotify premium subscriber, I could save running playlists directly on the smartwatch and listen to them without an LTE connection or my smartphone nearby. (Right now, only select Garmin and Samsung support Spotify offline listening.) Between that and the new integration with the Calm app, Samsung is throwing elbows to try and be the leader in health-minded smartwatches. And, for the most part, it’s working.

The Good: The Galaxy Watch Active is a lightweight and minimalist smartwatch that I slipped on my wrist a few weeks ago and it hasn’t come off since. It’s comfortable and sweat-resistant. The rose gold face is chic and simple. This minimalism spreads to the software as well. If you workout, there are 15 preloaded workouts like walking, stretching, cycling, running, plus more specific exercises like arm curls, back extensions, jumping jack, lat pulldowns and more. It has pretty good battery life compared to other smartwatches, including the Apple Watch Series 4. Spotify offline listening is a big reason for anybody, Samsung smartphone owner or not, to get this smartwatch. If you have a smartphone running on Android Pie OS, you’re able to try Calm, a meditation app/experience through the Samsung Health app, and then control those meditation sessions on their smartwatch.

Who It’s For: Anybody with a recent Samsung smartphone will get the most out of the Galaxy Watch Active, and that simply comes down to compatibility and knowhow; if you’re not used to Samsung’s apps and interphase, there’s a learning curve. Runners, walkers and gym-goers who like to workout without their phones will find the Spotify integration helpful. You can save your favorite tunes (up to 4 GB) and this makes logging miles or working out without a phone possible. If you hate charging your watch nightly, this one claims to last for up to 90 hours. Depending on how many activities I logged, I found the battery survived for a day and a half typically, which made it possible for me to plug it in during the day when I’m at work or home.

If you’re a Spotify Premium subscriber, you can download Spotify playlists onto the Galaxy Watch Active and listen to them offline.

Watch Out For: If you’re in Samsung’s ecosystem, figuring out the interface will be a smooth process. If you’re a lifelong iPhone owner, like me, it will likely take a few days to get used to the Samsung Galaxy Watch Active. The Spotify integration isn’t as seamless as I would have liked; in order to download playlists, you have to connect to Wi-Fi, find your playlists within the Spotify app, then find the ‘Download’ button, and even though that sounds like it’d be straightforward, it just wasn’t. Connecting my AirPods to smartwatch wasn’t an issue, but after using them with the Galaxy Watch Active, I had some trouble getting them repaired to my iPhone. When listening to music during workouts, be sure to start the music and set the volume before you go; the smartwatch doesn’t have a bezel or crown dial, so it was pretty difficult to raise or lower the volume.

Alternatives: Last year’s model, the Galaxy Watch ($300), is still available with many of the same features, albeit 6mm larger, which takes up a bulk of your wrist. The older models from Samsung’s line that are still available and also work with Spotify include the Gear Fit2 Pro ($200) and the Gear Sport ($280). Garmin makes some of the only other watches that allow you to download Spotify music to your tracker — the Vivoactive 3 Music ($280) is heavier and slightly bigger than the Galaxy. Outside of that, Fitbit’s Versa Lite ($160) is this small, with a rectangular face and has many of the same features — steps, calories, sleep tracking, 24/7 heart rate, waterproof and four-day battery life, but no music storage. An Apple Watch Series 4 ($399+), is a still the best smartwatch for anybody with an iPhone and lives in Apple’s ecosystem.

Review: I’m someone who brings their smartphone on every run. I tend to stuff it in my leggings or have to take off the case to get it to fit in a pair of shorts. I hate feeling it jostle around, admittedly. The thing is that the Spotify integration (for offline listening) is not available on the Apple Watch, so I have to bring my phone with me. With the Galaxy Watch Active, I didn’t have to do this. It was pretty liberating.

Setting up Spotify was a bit frustrating, admittedly, but once I was able to connect to Wi-Fi and downloaded my running playlist, I easily synced the watch to my AirPods and went out for my normal run. The first time I using Spotify offline on this watch, it was a bit finicky, too — the song kept cutting out for the first five minutes, but the longer I used it, the more seamless the music sounded.

The smartwatch proved to be a pretty reliable fitness tracker, and it was a seamless experience from a GPS standpoint. Whether I was logging three miles, ten miles or a track workout, the one button on and off switch was a breeze to tap. While the option was there never to use my phone, I typically carried it with me to check distance via the Nike Running app. On the few occasions that I forgot to log my runs, the app automatically recognized that I was on a run and recorded it anyway.

The big push around Samsung’s new watch is that it features an in-app connection with Calm, the best selling meditation app. You can select Calm’s watch face and it tells you to breathe, where you press on the watch face, hit start and then follow the nudges to breathe in and out. At the end of the six breaths, the watch will let you know if you’re still stressed and if you should sit still for a few more breaths. Over the three weeks, I pretty much always received the ‘you’re pretty stressed’ message and the option to keep breathing. On occasion, I’d see a graph of my stress (on a colored line that goes from blue to orange) and an arrow that points to where my heart rate was before the exercise and after.

The watch face of Samsung’s mediation app looks very similar to the Breath feature on the Apple Watch.

The last thing to hit on is this smartwatch’s sleep tracking ability, which, unfortunately, is where I had the most difficulty. Unlike any Apple Watch, the Galaxy Watch Active’s extended battery life and sleep tracking features encourage you to wear it to bed. To compare against, I had the Withings Sleep Tracking Mat ($100) that lies flat under my mattress to log sleep. When I looked at my sleep data and compared the data from the two devices, frankly, I was disappointed with what I got from the smartwatch. Of the five nights that I wore the Galaxy Watch Active to bed, I only got data for two nights. When researching this issue, I found that many others had experienced something similar. The solution is to make sure you activate ‘Goodnight mode’ before you go to bed, but this starts tracking your sleep right when you initiate the mode and won’t stop until turn it off. Basically, it’s not as automatic as I would’ve liked.

Verdict: If you’re active and have a Samsung or Android smartphone, this is a terrific little smartwatch. It’s also excellent for any Spotify premium subscriber looking for an active smartwatch. It always you to run or workout completely phone-free, undisturbed from calls, texts and Instagram notifications, and that’s a beautiful thing. While Samsung misses the mark on sleep tracking, and the Calm feature won’t feel game-changing for most, the most clutch feature might be the price. At $200, it’s half what the Apple Watch Series 4 is going for.

What Others Are Saying:

• “It’s competent as a running watch, too. During testing, it automatically detected and tracked my runs (it was hit or miss automatically detecting my bike rides, if that matters to you). You can also start a run manually, and although there are only two buttons, the touch screen works well enough with sweaty hands. It wouldn’t be my pick for intervals, as there’s no “lap” feature and the running-specific data fields can disappear and require some touch screen navigation to retrieve, but the auto-pause feature makes the watch perfectly convenient for regular stop-and-go efforts. ” — Dan Roe, Runner’s World

• “The 40mm aluminum case is light. It doesn’t look small on large wrists, or large on small wrists. It’s also easy to forget this watch is sitting on your wrist, which makes sleeping with it quite comfortable (it can track your sleep). It’s thin and will never really get caught on shirt cuffs. The 20mm straps are interchangeable, and the default silicone strap, which feels quite nice, comes with two sizes in the box.” — Julian Chokkattu, Digital Trends

• “Samsung’s Galaxy Watch Active isn’t trying to top the Galaxy Watch, and that’s a good thing, as it probably won’t do so. Not much stands out on the wearable, but it does feature a high-end design, a large display and some new exciting health features. Perhaps the best news, though, is that it comes at a much lower price.” — James Peckham, Techradar

Key Specs
Size: 40mm
OS: Tizen 4.0
Sensors: accelerometer, barometer, gyro sensor, HR sensor, light sensor
Battery: Up to 90 hours
Connectivity: Bluetooth v4.2
Weight: 25g
Compatibility: Android and iOS
Water Resistant: 5ATM and IP68

Samsung provided this product for review.

Read More Gear Patrol Reviews

Hot takes and in-depth reviews on noteworthy, relevant and interesting products. Read the Story
Note: Purchasing products through our links may earn us a portion of the sale, which supports our editorial team’s mission. Learn more here.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://gearpatrol.com/2019/04/16/samsung-galaxy-watch-active-smartwatch-review/

2019-04-16 07:45:49Z
52780268443770

Logitech's Harmony Express is a sleek Alexa-powered universal remote - Engadget

Logitech's popular Harmony universal remotes have long been the go-to solution for tech-savvy nerds who want to replace the bounty of ugly rectangles littering their coffee tables with a single, all-powerful option. But universal remotes are still pretty complex on their own, with dozens of buttons and, in some cases, LCD screens. You're basically swapping several remotes for something that looks like it belongs in one of NASA's Mission Control Centers. Now, there's something simpler: the Harmony Express, a compact universal remote that replaces a slew of buttons with Amazon Alexa voice controls.

Logitech Harmony Express

The $249 Express isn't meant to replace the Harmony Elite, which Logitech released back in 2015 and is still one of the best high-end universal remotes around. Instead, the company is aiming for consumers who want to reduce the clutter in their living rooms, but don't want to deal with another complex controller. And of course, it's also significantly more modern since it supports Alexa voice commands (the Elite doesn't even have a microphone). All you need to do is hit the voice button on the remote and say "Play Netflix," and your TV and home theater equipment will start up, head to the right inputs and launch the app.

Like the previous Harmony devices, the Express relies on an infra-red blaster base that sits underneath your TV and spits out control signals to nearby devices. There's also a smaller IR blaster that can sit elsewhere in your home theater to reach gadgets on other shelves. A companion app guides you through the setup process, which involves plugging in your TV and AV receiver models, and confirming other devices in your setup. It automatically detected the Apple TV 4K, PlayStation 4 Pro, Xbox One X, and Denon receiver in my living room, but I had to manually add my Nintendo Switch through a drop down menu.

Logitech Harmony Express

After that, I used the app to place my receiver under the right TV HDMI input, and then dragged the rest of my devices under my receiver's HDMI connections. The entire setup process took around 10 minutes, but it was relatively painless. After connecting the Harmony Express to my Alexa account, I held down the voice button on the remote, said "Turn on Xbox," and my TV and receiver automatically switched to their appropriate inputs. Saying "Play Hulu" switched everything over to my Apple TV 4K and automatically launched the streaming service app.

At first, the Harmony Express felt like everything I'd ever wanted in a modern universal remote, my entire entertainment system at my beck and call. But it wasn't too long before I noticed limitations: It can only launch apps, it can't play a specific movie or TV show. And it's not compatible with any of the Apple TV or Roku's voice commands, which means it can't take advantage of either boxes' voice search. Basically, you'll still need to keep your Apple and Roku remotes around. Logitech says it's working on getting deeper integration with those platforms, but it's unclear when, or if, that will happen.

As a standard remote, the Harmony Express feels comfortable to hold, with a rounded bottom half and smooth plastic finish. It's thicker and chunkier than the Apple TV remote, which means you're less likely to lose it in the couch, but it's also slimmer than Roku's bulbous controller. A circular ring on the top serves as your directional pad, while the center holds your standard "OK" button. Hold that down, and blue LEDs light up, telling you it's ready for voice commands.

The remote has only nine other buttons -- a breath of fresh air when compared to Logitech's previous controllers. On top of the expected volume and playback controls, there are back, home and menu buttons. A few also do double duty, a long press on the mute button turns off everything, while holding down Menu opens up options on some devices. There's a speaker on the back for Alexa's responses, which can get surprisingly loud (you control its volume through the app). Finally, a micro-USB port on the bottom lets you recharge the remote.

The Harmony Express is a serviceable remote for navigating the Apple TV's menus, my LG TV's options, or the Xbox One X's interface. But since it's relying on IR to control everything, there's a slight delay between hitting a button on the remote and the on-screen response. Apple and Roku's remotes are wirelessly connected to their set-top boxes directly, so they'll always be faster. Simply put, the main reason you'd want a Harmony Express is for simple voice controls.

Gallery: Logitech Harmony Express press images | 5 Photos

That being said, it's also a tempting option for anyone already relying on Alexa. The Express has all of the power of Amazon's virtual assistant behind it, so you can just as easily control the smart devices in your home as you can change streaming apps. The Alexa integration also works in reverse -- you can shout the same commands to an Echo in your home to control your TV setup. But it's worth noting that's something the Harmony Elite can already do with its Alexa skills, even though it doesn't have a microphone of its own.

I'll need to spend more time with the Harmony Express before I can fully judge it, but for now it seems lie an intriguing step forward for Logitech. Unfortunately, it's held back by limited integration with Apple and Roku's set-top boxes, something we might never end up seeing. At this point, the Harmony Express seems best suited for Amazon Alexa addicts who've dreamed of controlling TVs with their voices.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.engadget.com/2019/04/16/logitech-harmony-express-alexa-universal-remote/

2019-04-16 07:01:50Z
52780269897128

Logitech's Harmony Express is a sleek Alexa-powered universal remote - Engadget

Logitech's popular Harmony universal remotes have long been the go-to solution for tech-savvy nerds who want to replace the bounty of ugly rectangles littering their coffee tables with a single, all-powerful option. But universal remotes are still pretty complex on their own, with dozens of buttons and, in some cases, LCD screens. You're basically swapping several remotes for something that looks like it belongs in one of NASA's Mission Control Centers. Now, there's something simpler: the Harmony Express, a compact universal remote that replaces a slew of buttons with Amazon Alexa voice controls.

Logitech Harmony Express

The $249 Express isn't meant to replace the Harmony Elite, which Logitech released back in 2015 and is still one of the best high-end universal remotes around. Instead, the company is aiming for consumers who want to reduce the clutter in their living rooms, but don't want to deal with another complex controller. And of course, it's also significantly more modern since it supports Alexa voice commands (the Elite doesn't even have a microphone). All you need to do is hit the voice button on the remote and say "Play Netflix," and your TV and home theater equipment will start up, head to the right inputs and launch the app.

Like the previous Harmony devices, the Express relies on an infra-red blaster base that sits underneath your TV and spits out control signals to nearby devices. There's also a smaller IR blaster that can sit elsewhere in your home theater to reach gadgets on other shelves. A companion app guides you through the setup process, which involves plugging in your TV and AV receiver models, and confirming other devices in your setup. It automatically detected the Apple TV 4K, PlayStation 4 Pro, Xbox One X, and Denon receiver in my living room, but I had to manually add my Nintendo Switch through a drop down menu.

Logitech Harmony Express

After that, I used the app to place my receiver under the right TV HDMI input, and then dragged the rest of my devices under my receiver's HDMI connections. The entire setup process took around 10 minutes, but it was relatively painless. After connecting the Harmony Express to my Alexa account, I held down the voice button on the remote, said "Turn on Xbox," and my TV and receiver automatically switched to their appropriate inputs. Saying "Play Hulu" switched everything over to my Apple TV 4K and automatically launched the streaming service app.

At first, the Harmony Express felt like everything I'd ever wanted in a modern universal remote, my entire entertainment system at my beck and call. But it wasn't too long before I noticed limitations: It can only launch apps, it can't play a specific movie or TV show. And it's not compatible with any of the Apple TV or Roku's voice commands, which means it can't take advantage of either boxes' voice search. Basically, you'll still need to keep your Apple and Roku remotes around. Logitech says it's working on getting deeper integration with those platforms, but it's unclear when, or if, that will happen.

As a standard remote, the Harmony Express feels comfortable to hold, with a rounded bottom half and smooth plastic finish. It's thicker and chunkier than the Apple TV remote, which means you're less likely to lose it in the couch, but it's also slimmer than Roku's bulbous controller. A circular ring on the top serves as your directional pad, while the center holds your standard "OK" button. Hold that down, and blue LEDs light up, telling you it's ready for voice commands.

The remote has only nine other buttons -- a breath of fresh air when compared to Logitech's previous controllers. On top of the expected volume and playback controls, there are back, home and menu buttons. A few also do double duty, a long press on the mute button turns off everything, while holding down Menu opens up options on some devices. There's a speaker on the back for Alexa's responses, which can get surprisingly loud (you control its volume through the app). Finally, a micro-USB port on the bottom lets you recharge the remote.

The Harmony Express is a serviceable remote for navigating the Apple TV's menus, my LG TV's options, or the Xbox One X's interface. But since it's relying on IR to control everything, there's a slight delay between hitting a button on the remote and the on-screen response. Apple and Roku's remotes are wirelessly connected to their set-top boxes directly, so they'll always be faster. Simply put, the main reason you'd want a Harmony Express is for simple voice controls.

Gallery: Logitech Harmony Express press images | 5 Photos

That being said, it's also a tempting option for anyone already relying on Alexa. The Express has all of the power of Amazon's virtual assistant behind it, so you can just as easily control the smart devices in your home as you can change streaming apps. The Alexa integration also works in reverse -- you can shout the same commands to an Echo in your home to control your TV setup. But it's worth noting that's something the Harmony Elite can already do with its Alexa skills, even though it doesn't have a microphone of its own.

I'll need to spend more time with the Harmony Express before I can fully judge it, but for now it seems lie an intriguing step forward for Logitech. Unfortunately, it's held back by limited integration with Apple and Roku's set-top boxes, something we might never end up seeing. At this point, the Harmony Express seems best suited for Amazon Alexa addicts who've dreamed of controlling TVs with their voices.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.engadget.com/2019/04/16/logitech-harmony-express-alexa-universal-remote/

2019-04-16 07:01:47Z
52780269897128

Samsung Galaxy Fold hands-on: Bridging the gap between tablet and phone - Android Central

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fd3zECAG-F4

2019-04-16 05:12:28Z
52780268443770

Senin, 15 April 2019

Damn, Could the Samsung Galaxy Fold Be Worth It? - Gizmodo

Photo: Sam Rutherford (Gizmodo)

The Galaxy Fold represents more than eight years of design, engineering, and brand new tech, just to realize a phone with a flexible screen that works. We’re talking new malleable adhesives and complicated composite polymers made specifically to support the bendy display. And now after months of teasing, I’ve finally gotten a chance to check one out in the flesh. And despite its nearly $2,000 price tag, the Galaxy Fold is proof that the whole bendy phone trend could be more than just a fad.

From the first touch, the Galaxy Fold feels solid. It emits a super satisfying snap you every time you close the phone, something that echoes the best thing about flip phones from back in the day. But the other thing you notice before even opening the phone is how long the Galaxy Fold is—it’s a true candy bar of a handset

Advertisement

From there, you can either use the exterior “cover screen” as you would any other smartphone, although its 4.6-inch display means you’re a bit limited on real estate. Of course, that’s where that big flexible screen comes in because as soon as you open up the phone, whatever was on the outside is suddenly inside on the device’s bendy 7.3-inch display.

From an angle, the Galaxy Fold’s crease is definitely there, but from straight on, it almost completely fades away and becomes much less obtrusive.
Photo: Sam Rutherford (Gizmodo)

And if you’re a heavy multitasker, things only continue to get better, as you can then swipe in the from the right side of the screen to get a little row of apps that let you open up to three different apps at once. Thanks to the ability to pop out one additional app inside a floating window, the Fold’s true multitasking app count stands at four.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, to ensure those transitions and app performance is as smooth as possible, the Galaxy Fold features a Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 processor, 512GB of storage, and a whopping 12GB of RAM. As a bonus, like the Galaxy S10, the Galaxy Fold features Qi wireless charging along with Samsung’s PowerShare tech that lets you juice up your other devices. Though, in terms of real-world durability, the Fold not having any water resistance is a bummer.

Now to be clear, the Fold’s ability to switch apps between screens, what Samsung calls App continuity, is still very much in its early stages. This sort of multi-app functionality isn’t even natively available in Android yet (it’s coming in Android Q), though Samsung has worked with Google and other partners to ensure a lot of major first and third-party apps look good on the big flexy screen. But that’s not always the case for less popular apps, or some games, which resort to a 16:9 letterboxed view.

Advertisement

However, despite featuring two batteries that are joined together to form a 4,380 mAh power pack, I still have to wonder if the Galaxy Fold has enough longevity to keep that big display and everything else running. But that’s a question I should be able to answer once I’ve had a chance to spend more time with it.

Because of the the Galaxy Fold’s design, instead of putting a fingerprint reader on the front or back, Samsung put the Fold’s fingerprint sensor on its side.
Photo: Sam Rutherford (Gizmodo)

The Fold also comes with six total cameras, so you’re never without some way of taking a selfie. In front, there’s a 10-MP cam above the cover screen, while a second 12-MP selfie cam and an 8-MP depth cam to help with portrait-style shots live on the inside. However, like on a regular phone, the real camera talent resides in the back, with the Fold offering a 16-MP ultra-wide camera, a 12-MP wide-angle camera, and a 2x telephoto cam.

Advertisement

The Galaxy Fold has a noticeable crease, but when you’re using it normally, it’s way less distracting than I anticipated. Generally, it fades away, potentially becoming less annoying than even a scratch on a screen. But depending on the situation and available ambient light, you may still notice it even when watching a video. It’s impressive, but Samsung did not magically defy the material constraints, and doubtless, for some people, the imperfection will be seen as a failure.

Similarly, the thickness of the device will remain controversial for some people. Personally, I think it wouldn’t bother me in the long run but for some of my colleagues who insist on tiny pants, the thickness will be a dealbreaker.

And even if that crease and that thickness don’t wind up being too annoying, there’s still one more reality people will need to get over: $1,980 is a serious chunk of money, especially for a V1 device. This thing is likely to only find its home with people who value keeping up with the absolute bleeding edge of tech.

Advertisement

After a short time with the device, I was charmed by the package as a whole. I found myself imagining the Fold fitting into my life seamlessly with almost zero adjustment.

But the question remains, would you pay nearly $2,000 for the chance to own one? I’m still not sure but stay tuned for our full review very soon.

Depending on which of the Galaxy Fold’s four colors you choose, you may also be able to select what color the hinge is.
Photo: Sam Rutherford (Gizmodo)

Advertisement

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://gizmodo.com/damn-could-the-samsung-galaxy-fold-be-worth-it-1834052626

2019-04-15 20:14:00Z
52780268443770

PSA: Microsoft Outlook Breach Worse Than Expected, Hackers Could Read Emails of 6% of Affected Users - Mac Rumors

High time for a "internet reboot" 2.0


It's high time for companies to be held accountable for breeches in a severe monetary fashion.

The only way they are going to get better at security, or take security seriously, is if it affects their bottom line in a big way if they don't.

I am pretty sure I am one of the affected users, I could see weird stuffs last month with my email, I even received a notification of an app permission granted, something I don’t even use.
[doublepost=1555350313][/doublepost]

And this is why I always say - never write anything down that you wouldn't want everyone to know. I'm sure the hackers will sell the email content to someone who will blackmail the victims.


I get your point but it is not just about that. Your work, research, sales, etc. may rely on email and you don’t want unauthorized access to it.
Yet another huge company gets hacked and loses customer data. Is there no accountability anywhere now?
High time for a "internet reboot" 2.0

And this is why I always say - never write anything down that you wouldn't want everyone to know. I'm sure the hackers will sell the email content to someone who will blackmail the victims.


These breeches are typically not about finding users to blackmail. These are typically done to gain access to ones credentials or learn about users for informed phishing attempts.
So some techs account was "hacked". Does that mean unsafe use of a computer and picking up malware? Does it mean weak password or not changing passwords frequently? Or some other stupid usage.

From my experience the weakest security link in corporate environments are typically ill-informed users or just plain stupid people. Anyone with privileged access should be locked down and audited, single purpose accounts, etc.
[doublepost=1555352287][/doublepost]

That won't be sufficient, a "internet reboot" 2.0 would be much better.

For instance, your private information stays on your device, end to end full encryption mandatory for the whole internet.
Keys are in your possession, not anywhere else.
Standard opt-out for everything.


Intel communities would never allow that to happen.
[doublepost=1555352428][/doublepost]

Except this was a support agent employee's credentials that were hacked and used to get in, so how do you fine a company or hold them responsible for what someone was loose with potentially out of the work environment? Other than fire the person what more can the company do? There is always that human aspect that is the weak link.

Its hard to say what more they could have done here without facts; did the employee have it written on a sticky note at lost it being completely negligent? We simply dont have the facts


Yes, agreed it is usually stupid employees. There is much that can be done to make such people less harmful. See my above post. And yes, the companies need to take responsibility for employees.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.macrumors.com/2019/04/15/microsoft-outlook-msn-hotmail-breach/

2019-04-15 17:27:00Z
52780268984608

Unfolding the Samsung Galaxy Fold - TechCrunch

The Galaxy Fold is real. I’ve held it in my hands — a few of them, actually. Samsung’s briefing this morning was littered with the things, in different colors and different states of unfolded. A month or so ago, this was anything but a given.

After eight years of teasing a folding device, Samsung finally pulled the trigger at its developer’s conference late last year. But the device was shrouded in darkness. Then in February, it took the stage as the Galaxy Fold, but there was no phone waiting for us. Ditto for Mobile World Congress a week later, when the device was trapped like a carbonite Han Solo behind a glass display.

With preorders for the phone opening today, ahead of an expected April 26 sale, things were getting down to the wire for Samsung. But this morning, at an event in New York, the Galaxy Fold was on full display, ready to be put through its paces. We happily did just that in the hour or so we had with the product.

Once you get over the surprise that it’s real and about to ship, you find yourself pretty impressed with what Samsung’s done here. It’s easy to get frustrated about a product the company’s essentially been teasing since showing off its first flexible display at 2011, but a radically new form factor is an easy contender for first-generation woes. The fold, on the other hand, is a device that’s been run through the wringer.

Samsung’s already shown us what fold testing looks like in a promotion video that debuted a few weeks back. The handset was subject to 200,000 of those machine folds, which amounts to a lot more than the life of the product. And yes, before you ask, they were subjected to drop testing, the same sort of violent gadget abuse Samsung puts the rest of its gadgets through — both open and closed.

Ditto for the eight-point battery test it’s been subjecting all of its devices to since the Note 7. That’s doubly important given the fact that the Galaxy Fold sports twice the battery. All told, it has 4380mAh, split in two, on either side of the fold. That amounts to “all day battery life” according to Samsung. That’s the same claim you’ll get on most of these devices ahead of launch. Though the Fold apparently presents an extra layer of ambiguity, given that the company isn’t entirely sure how people are actually going to use the thing, once they get it in their hands.

The folding mechanism works well, snapping shut with a satisfying sound, thanks in part to some on-board magnets hidden near the edge. In fact, when the Fold is lying screen down, it has the tendency to attract pieces of metal around it. I found myself absent-mindedly opening and closing the thing. When not in use, it’s like an extremely expensive fidget spinner.

Samsung’s done a remarkable job maintaining the design language from the rest of the Galaxy line. But for the odd form factor, the Fold looks right at home alongside the S10 and the like. The rounded metallic corners, the camera array and, yes, the Bixby button are all on board here.

The edges are split in two, with each screen getting its own half. When the Fold is open, they sit next to each other, with a small gap between the two. When the phone is folded, they pull apart, coming together at a 90 degree angle from the hinge. It’s an elegant solution, with a series of interlocking gears that allow the system to fold and unfold for the life of the product.

Unsurprisingly, Samsung tested a variety of different form factors, but said this was the most “intuitive” for a first-gen product like this. Of course, numerous competing devices have already taken different approaches, so it’s going to be fascinating watching what the industry ultimately lands on when more of these products are out in the world.

Unfolded, the device is surprisingly thin — a hair under the iPhone XS. Folded, it’s a bit beefier than two iPhones, owing to a gap between the displays. While the edges of the device come into contact when closed, they form a long, isosceles triangle, with a gap that increases as you move toward the middle.

Unfolded, the seam in the middle of the display is, indeed, noticeable. It’s subtle, though. You’ll really only notice it as your finger drags across it or when the light hits it the right way. That’s just part of life in the age of the folding phone, so get used to it.

[gallery ids="1812546,1812545,1812544,1812543,1812542,1812541,1812540,1812539,1812538,1812537,1812536,1812535,1812534,1812533,1812532"]

The inner display measures 7.3 inches. Compare that to, say, the iPad Mini’s 7.9. So, small for a tablet, but way too big to stick in your pocket without folding it up. The size of the interior display renders the notch conversation a bit moot. There’s actually a pretty sizable cutout in the upper-right corner for the front-facing camera.

Samsung’s been working with Google and a handful of developers, including WhatsApp and Spotify, to create a decent experience for users at launch. There are two key places this counts: app continuity and multi-app windows. The first lets you open an app on the small screen and pick up where you left off on the big one, once unfolded. The second makes it possible to have three apps open at once — something that’s become standard on tablets in the last couple of years.

Both work pretty seamlessly, though the functionality is limited to those companies that have enabled it. Samsung says it’s an easy addition, but the speed with which developers adopt it will depend largely on the success of these devices. Given that Samsung’s worked hand in hand with Google/Android on this, however, gives the company a big leg up on the competition.

All told, I’m pretty impressed with what amounts to a first-gen product. This thing was a long time in the making, and Samsung clearly wanted to get things right. The company admittedly had some of the wind taken out of its sails when Huawei announced its own folding device a few days later.

That product highlighted some of the Fold’s shortcomings, including the small front-facing screen and somewhat bulky design language. The Fold’s not perfect, but it’s a pretty solid first take at a new smartphone paradigm. And with a starting price of $1,980, it’s got a price to match. You’re essentially paying double for twice the screen.

Samsung, Huawei and the rest of the companies exploring the space know that they’re only going to sell so many of these things in the first go-round at this price point. Everyone’s still exploring aspects like folding mechanisms, essentially making early adopters guinea pigs this time out.

But while the fold doesn’t feel like a phone that’s achieved its final form, it’s a surprisingly well-realized first-generation phone.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://techcrunch.com/2019/04/15/unfolding-the-samsung-galaxy-fold/

2019-04-15 16:38:59Z
52780268443770