Sabtu, 03 Agustus 2019

The Galaxy Fold was ruined by rumor culture and you're to blame - CNET

samsung-galaxy-fold-55

The Galaxy Fold is the latest example of how companies need to wait to launch products until they are absolutely ready.

Angela Lang/CNET

If you don't quite remember what was happening on April 26 of this year, I don't blame you -- it was a pretty long time ago. To jog your memory, it was Arbor Day, National Pretzel Day, Good Friday and the end of Passover. Avengers: Endgame opened in theaters. Joe Biden announced his candidacy for president and Taylor Swift released her single ME! The hyped-up Galaxy Fold was supposed to go on sale that day. But after some journalists discovered problems with the phone's folding screen in their pre-production models, Samsung delayed its launch.

Samsung was wise to do this because it would have been a disaster if consumers got their hands on the Galaxy Fold before it was ready. I would be angry and frustrated had I paid $1,980 for a phone only to have it break a couple of weeks later. All in all, it took Samsung three months to fix and improve the Fold. To be exact it was 89 days from when it was supposed to go on sale to when Samsung announced that consumers will be able to get one sometime in September.

But the Galaxy Fold wasn't the only gadget to be rescinded by a major company this year. On March 29, about a month before Samsung delayed the Fold, Apple put the kibosh on its much hyped AirPower wireless charging mat. Apple first teased the charging pad during the launch of the iPhone X all the way back in September 2017 and slated it to go on sale by the end of 2018. But that didn't happen and the company decided to cancel the product altogether. For a company known for its meticulousness, the media was quick to describe this blunder as "embarrassing" and "unprecedented." Even CNET identified the incident as one of Apple's worst failures of all time".

"After much effort, we've concluded AirPower will not achieve our high standards, and we have cancelled the project," said Dan Riccio, Apple's senior vice president of hardware engineering, in a statement.

Apple

Samsung and Apple are both guilty of generating Kickstarter-style hype to sell us on a product before they can actually sell the product. While I can't begin to imagine the complex engineering and problem-solving required to get a phone screen to fold without breaking, or design an efficient charging pad that can juice up different devices all at the same time, I had to believe that if any companies could do that it'd be Samsung and Apple, respectively. For starters, these aren't obscure startups looking for funding -- they are multi-billion dollar companies with tons of resources and a history of successful products. Heck, Apple has more money than the US Treasury. And second, I believed them because they told us they were going to make these products.

True, there are some differences between what Samsung and Apple did. Apple teased a product and put a red circle on the calendar when it thought the product would be ready. It was disappointing when it was canceled because people were genuinely excited about it. An excitement, I should point out again, that was whipped up because Apple teased the product before it was ready.

But Samsung did something much worse. It put the Galaxy Fold in the hands of reviewers before it was ready and began pre-orders for consumers. But it wasn't before it was willing to take two grand from some eager early adopters -- which it eventually had to return -- that Samsung announced that the Fold would be delayed. Either Samsung knew it was rushing the Galaxy Fold out the door, or that the company thought the phone was ready to go only to discover it had some serious flaws. It is particularly alarming if the latter is true because only a few years ago Samsung recalled all Galaxy Note 7 phones over batteries that failed and caught on fire. At least Apple had the foresight or conservatism to cancel AirPower altogether instead of shipping a faulty product.

Now playing: Watch this: People try the Galaxy Fold for the first time

5:50

This problem certainly extends beyond Samsung and Apple, but they are the most egregious and high-profile examples of how companies are happy to sell us an idea before it's fully baked, inevitably causing more headaches for users when the idea backfires. I review phones, and I can't tell you how many times I had a phone with software that wasn't fully ready for review.

Crowdsourcing sites like Kickstarter and IndieGoGo are happily building momentum around vaporware, or products that have no guarantee of coming to light. Consumers are basically placing hope and good faith on an idea. Catchy promo videos and 3D renderings get us excited about the possibilities which, in turn, makes us open our wallets and put down cash. In reality, it's all a gamble and it's a shame when what was promised isn't delivered.

Consequently, a culture has formed where selling consumers on an idea is often prioritized over the fit and finish of the final product. Samsung's initial plan to launch the Galaxy Fold in April would have shown consumers and the world that it's possible to make a high end phone with a folding screen. As my colleague, Jessica Dolcourt wrote in her in-depth review of the Galaxy Fold, "The world doesn't need foldable phones. We can get along perfectly fine without them. But we should want them -- not as the Fold is now, but as it could be."

But companies aren't the only ones who should bear all the responsibility for shipping products before they're ready. News publications, and in this particular case tech news outlets including CNET, relish every leak and rumor about a new product like Nicolas Cage scouring the back of the Declaration of Independence in National Treasure. While I'm genuinely excited about the next Galaxy Note and the next iPhone, I don't need to see every account of a random tweet posted that shows off a poorly-lit photo (likely fake) of the Galaxy Note 10 or the iPhone 11. Heck, there are rumors already circling about the 2020 iPhone.

This cycle of hyping up every rumor and leak makes it nearly impossible for companies to truly surprise us with an innovative, polished product out of the box. Google tried to break that cycle by confirming the leaks and rumors around its next phone and sharing a photo of the Pixel 4 four months before its expected launch date.

As consumers, we are enthusiastically hungry to know about the smallest details about the next big thing. This puts companies like Samsung and Apple in a position where they can either lead that excitement or watch a competitor do so. Companies feed the hype, tech news outlets report that hype to consumers who then, in turn, open their wallets.

Samsung and Apple are ultimately responsible for the products they make, but we must share some of the blame for participating in a culture where Samsung felt it needed to push the Galaxy Fold out before it was absolutely ready for consumers. Not every product is going to be the "next iPhone" and revolutionize the world and that's fine. 

What's interesting is that Samsung now has a second chance to launch the Galaxy Fold. I hope the money and time Samsung spent reworking the Galaxy Fold will serve as a reminder to value its own products over being first to deliver some novel technology. I genuinely hope the Galaxy Fold is a success. But I want Samsung and Apple, as well as any other company working on a "revolutionary" product, to make sure that the product is ready and polished before getting people's hopes up, putting it into their hands and taking their money.

Originally published July 29 at 3:30 a.m. PT

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnet.com/news/the-galaxy-fold-was-ruined-by-rumor-culture-and-youre-to-blame/

2019-08-03 12:30:01Z
CAIiEF6j2r7Vbz2-KbJT8mch2d0qEwgEKgwIACoFCAow4GowoAgwkRo

Dear Apple and Samsung, $1,000 is way too much for a smartphone, consumers say - USA TODAY

For Bill Wilson, it's simple. He won't pay $1,000 for a smartphone. Period. 

"I'll be hanging onto my iPhone 6 Plus until grim death," says the radio production manager from Gainesville, Georgia.  One grand "is just too much money for what you get."

Wilson is in ample company. This week's earnings reports for Apple and Samsung both showed a clear trend: consumer resistance to the ever-growing high prices of premium smartphones. 

The iPhone line now starts at $449, versus $350 in 2018, and topped at $1,100, while Samsung's premium Galaxy phones are near the $1,000 mark as well. A new model, the Fold, will break all pricing records when it's released in September at close to $2,000.

In quarterly earnings announced this week, Apple's iPhone revenue declined 12% to $26 billion from $29 billion in the year-ago quarter, while Samsung blamed "weak sales momentum" for the Galaxy S10. Angelo Zino, an analyst with CFRA Research, says Apple iPhone sales will tumble 15% in the current fiscal year. 

On Wednesday, Samsung is set to unveil its latest smartphone, a new edition of the Note, which currently sells for between $799 and $999.

So good luck with that, Samsung. 

Apple got additional bad news this week when President Donald Trump announced new tariffs on China imports that would include the iPhone since it's assembled in China with mostly Chinese parts. This would add $75 to $100 to the price of an iPhone, predicts Daniel Ives, an analyst with Wedbush Securities. 

Ouch. 

So why have premium smartphones stumbled? Consider a variety of factors:

—$1,000 is a massive stop sign.

—The new features introduced over the last few years haven't been game-changing. Consumers really don't care about facial recognition, augmented reality, faster processor enough to pony up the big bucks.

—The older phones work great and don't fall apart. Sure, the batteries deteriorate, but you can get a new one for under $50 to $70. And if you crack a screen, which is likely, the cost is $150 to $200 for an older iPhone or Galaxy. So if you have, say, an older iPhone 7, and you replace those items, you're looking at around $200 or so to upgrade. That's a lot less than $1,000 for a new phone. 

—We like the new and improved cameras, but for the majority of the world, selfies and food shots taken on an iPhone 6 won't look that much different from those snapped on an iPhone XS. The software update tools Apple releases every year make the cameras and photo management in general better, and the update is free. Apple is expected to release the latest update, iOS 13, in September. 

Wilson will find himself in ample company, then as when the iOS 13 update is released, as it will only work with phones from the 6S (first introduced in 2015) and up. Sure, the 6 Plus phone will still function, but it won't get software updates or the new features Apple will be introducing for iPhone users, like Dark Mode, an all-new look to Maps and improved photo management. 

Apple hopes Wilson will be so inspired by the new features, he'll run out and buy a new edition iPhone. Apple is expected to release three new models in September, all at the same price points as the 2018 editions, $749, $999 and $1,099, according to analysts. 

The best deals, however, are for used (or, as Amazon now calls the category, "Renewed") editions. An Apple iPhone 8, first released in 2017, sells in the $250 to $300 range on various websites. Add the new battery, and you can get a fast phone, with a great camera and the latest software, for a steal. 

The Galaxy phones from just a few months ago have already seen a big price drop, at $549 (down $200) for the S10e. Better yet, pick up the S8, also from 2017, also in the $300 range, and you get a fast phone with an expandable memory slot, which also negates one of the reasons people ditch their phones. They ran out of room. Pick up a hefty 32 GB memory card for $20, and you're set. 

Of course, more consumers than not were happy to pay the big bucks and get the latest and greatest. Ross Kestin of Manhattan Beach, California recently formed over a grand for a Samsung Note 9 "and so far I think I'm getting my moneys worth. This Galaxy Note 9 is phenomenal."

New or used? I'd love to hear from you. Please join the discussion on Twitter, where I'm @jeffersongraham. 

In other tech news this week

Another week, another massive data breach. This week, it was Capital One bank, and just, 100 million accounts. ICYMI, here's how to protect your data. 

Sonos and IKEA teamed up for a new product line of stylish speakers and a lamp that doubles as a stereo. We took both out for a test spin this week. 

Ancestry.com introduced new tools to find relatives who were displaced in the Holocaust. 

This week's Talking Tech podcasts

e-Scooters have got to go. 

Remembering CD-Rs

Credit Hack - what to do?

The Hack Attack

Trump tariffs and added cost to iPhones

Subscribe to the Talking Tech newsletter, http://technewsletter.usatodsay.com, listen to the daily Talking Tech podcast wherever you listen to podcasts and follow me (@jeffersongraham) on Twitter, Instagram and YouTube. 

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/talkingtech/2019/08/03/consumers-tell-apple-and-samsung-no-thanks-to-1000-dollar-smartphones/1900716001/

2019-08-03 11:16:00Z
52780344455527

Wi-Fi 6 speed test: These are the fastest routers we've ever seen - CNET

wi-fi-6-logo

The age of Wi-Fi 6 is just beginning. So how much faster will those transmissions be?

We're at the very beginning of the Wi-Fi 6 era, and new, next-gen routers capable of putting 802.11ax's upgraded features to work are already up for sale. It's early, though. Despite the fact that Wi-Fi 6 routers are backward-compatible with previous-gen Wi-Fi devices, they won't be able to do much of anything to speed them up. For that, you'll need new devices that support Wi-Fi 6, too -- and hardly any are currently available.

That also means that it'll be a while before we're really able to test out Wi-Fi 6's claims of being much, much better at connecting with lots and lots of devices at once. Ultimately, that might mean faster Wi-Fi at places like airports and stadiums, but we're probably a few years away from feeling the full impact.

Still, that hasn't stopped us from wondering just how fast Wi-Fi 6 top speeds will ultimately be once new hardware gets here. Early estimates describe those top Wi-Fi 6 transfer speeds as 30% faster than the top Wi-Fi 5 transfer speeds. Sure enough, a quick look at the specs on a new Wi-Fi 6 router like the Netgear Nighthawk AX12 pegs the top speed on the 2.4GHz band at 1.2 gigabits per second, which is right around 30% faster than the fastest Wi-Fi 5 speeds we've tested here at CNET.

The Killer 1650x Wi-Fi 6 module works with select PCs, and is available now on Amazon for $35.

Rivet Networks

And, while it's true that there aren't many Wi-Fi 6 client devices available yet, that doesn't mean that there aren't any. In fact, if you've got the right kind of computer, you can get a Wi-Fi 6 adapter on Amazon right now for $35.

We picked one of those up for ourselves, along with that Netgear Nighthawk AX12 Wi-Fi 6 router. With the two of them, we were able to do some early Wi-Fi 6 speed tests. Here's how that went.

Our test setup

The Netgear Nighthawk AX12 promises speeds of up to 1.2 Gbps on the 2.4GHz band and up to 4.8 Gbps on the 5GHz band. There are a lot of limitations on that at the moment -- one of them being that our internet speeds at the office aren't nearly that fast.

We can still test the router's top transfer speeds by measuring its ability to move files around locally, though. The router comes with a set of two 1-gigabit Ethernet ports in the back that you can aggregate into a single connection from two incoming servers. We connected those ports to a pair of MacBooks that acted as our servers for the test. They'd transmit data to the router over those Ethernet connections for an aggregated upload speed of 2 Gbps. From there, a third computer equipped with that Killer Wi-Fi 6 module would connect to the router to download the data wirelessly. 

In other words, we'd be able to measure top download speeds of up to 2 Gbps using speed-testing JPERF software.

The result: a top speed that clocked in at 1,320 Mbps, or 1.32 Gbps. The support team for that Killer module at Rivet Networks told us that the numbers we were seeing sounded about right, and that in a different environment, perhaps one with less interference, we might see speeds as high as 1.4 or 1.5 Gbps. We'll keep testing, but for now, 1.32 Gbps is the best result we've seen.

But hey, that's a lot of numbers, and numbers are easier to process when you put them into perspective. To do so, I'mma call in the big guns.

Avengers, assemble!

Setting aside Spider-Man: Far From Home, which isn't available as a digital download yet, the Marvel Cinematic Universe consists of a whopping 22 films adapted from Marvel comic books, stretching from Iron Man to Guardians of the Galaxy to Black Panther all the way up to Avengers: Endgame. It'd take more than 48 hours of screen time to watch them all -- just ask CNET's Abrar Al-Heeti, who actually pulled it off in a single 59-hour marathon.

Now, let's say you wanted to follow in Abrar's footsteps and host a Marvel marathon of your own. You don't want to rent, you don't want to stream, and you don't want to wrangle a bunch of discs -- you want your own, high-quality digital copies of each film, and you'll need to download them. 

Ry Crist/CNET

Assuming you were downloading them in 4K resolution using the same compression standards as Blu-Ray, each film would eat up about 70 gigbytes of storage space. The grand total for 48 hours and 11 minutes of footage? 1,580 gigabytes -- more than a terabyte and a half.

So. How long would it take you to download all of those files?

Well, according to the global speed index at Ookla, a top speed-testing site, the average download speed in the US is now 119 megabits per second. Bits aren't the same as bytes, mind you, but the conversion is easy: You just divide the bits by 8. So, with that average, 119-megabits-per-second connection, you'd be able to download about 15 megabytes per second -- or .015 gigabytes per second. Dividing our grand total of 1,580 gigabytes by .015 tells us that downloading the entire MCU with an average connection speed would take 105,333 seconds. 

That's roughly 29 hours and 16 minutes. And you don't even have a time stone to speed things up.

In my home, I'm lucky enough to have a direct fiber connection. My plan is set at 300 Mbps, which is easily fast enough for my purposes, but entry-level as far as fiber goes. If that speed held steady, I'd be able to download the entire MCU in about 11 hours, 42 minutes. 

What if I upgraded to the best possible fiber connection, complete with the top-of-the-line hardware needed to take advantage of it? The fastest Wi-Fi 5 router we've tested is the Asus RT-AC86U, which clocked in with an impressive transfer speed of 938 Mbps on the 5GHz band. With that router and a fiber connection that was fast enough to match it, I could download all 22 MCU films in about 3 hours and 45 minutes.

This brings us to Wi-Fi 6. Like I said before, we clocked the Netgear Nighthawk AX12 at a top transfer speed of 1,320 Mbps. Assuming we had an internet connection of at least that speed, we'd be able to download all 22 films in just 2 hours and 40 minutes. At that speed, you could download the entire MCU almost 11 times before someone at the average US speed was able to download it once.

Hold your horses

Again, the big, obvious problem with all of that is that most people don't have access to faster-than-average internet speeds. A direct fiber connection only became available in my neighborhood very recently -- before that, I was living with cable internet download speeds of about 62 Mbps, which is well below the national average.

A Wi-Fi 6 router wouldn't do much of anything to speed up a connection like that, or even the speedier fiber connection I'm enjoying now. And without Wi-Fi 6-compatible laptops and devices, I wouldn't be able to enjoy the faster local transfers within my home's network, either. For almost all of us, it's way too early to upgrade to a new Wi-Fi 6 router.

It's a bit like a bucket brigade. A Wi-Fi 6 router is like someone who's really, really good at passing buckets of water back and forth -- say, 100 buckets a minute. But that only matters if the guy next to him is also capable of handling 100 buckets per minute. If that person can only hand off 20 buckets per minute, then 20 buckets per minute is all you can expect from the entire brigade.

tp-link-archer-ax11000-wi-fi-6-router-wifi

The TP-Link Archer AX11000 promises wireless top speeds of nearly 11 gigabits per second -- but it'll likely be years before you're able to hit speeds like that.

TP-Link

In other words, your internet connection is only as fast as its slowest link. And for most of us, our ISP's top download speed is going to be the slowest link.

The silver lining to that is that is that we can expect some pretty dramatic jumps in internet speeds in the coming years. Experts pegged Wi-Fi 6 as 30% faster than Wi-Fi 5, and our early tests seem to indicate that it's an accurate claim. But that's compared to the fastest possible Wi-Fi 5 connections. The speed jumps are much, much more significant when you compare them to the average internet speeds that most of us are currently stuck with. Not 30% faster, but 1,000% faster. 

And that's just based off of our first speed test -- other routers might produce even faster results in the months ahead. One option from TP-Link even promises theoretical maximum speeds of 10,756 Mbps -- nearly 11 gigabits per second.

Of course, jumps like that are going to require more than just a new router -- they're going to require fiber internet speeds that are faster than a single gigabit per second. Connections like that aren't widely available yet, but when they get here, it appears that the hardware will be ready to take advantage of them. That's thanks to Wi-Fi 6.

In the meantime, we'll continue testing out the newest routers to see if we can find any that are even faster than the Netgear model we used here. You can also expect to see fresh tests and reviews for the current-gen routers and mesh systems that can tide you over until Wi-Fi 6 becomes a more meaningful upgrade. Do stay tuned.

Originally published Aug. 2 and updated regularly.

CNET Smart Home

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnet.com/news/wi-fi-6-speed-test-fastest-routers-weve-ever-seen/

2019-08-03 11:00:00Z
CBMiTGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmNuZXQuY29tL25ld3Mvd2ktZmktNi1zcGVlZC10ZXN0LWZhc3Rlc3Qtcm91dGVycy13ZXZlLWV2ZXItc2Vlbi_SAVdodHRwczovL3d3dy5jbmV0LmNvbS9nb29nbGUtYW1wL25ld3Mvd2ktZmktNi1zcGVlZC10ZXN0LWZhc3Rlc3Qtcm91dGVycy13ZXZlLWV2ZXItc2Vlbi8

Galaxy Note 10: Samsung has one more chance to impress me this year - CNET

2019-07-31-15-55-07

What the Note 10 Plus will reportedly look like.

WinFuture

The Galaxy Note 10 has its work cut out for it. Samsung phones have had a rough year. There have been a lot of them, but most have failed to make a meaningful splash (here's proof that Galaxy S10 phones aren't selling) and the one phone that did is now delayed. That leaves the Note 10 (and rumored Note 10 Plus) as Samsung's last shot to blow us all away before rival brands ratchet up the competition. 

Don't get me wrong -- the Galaxy S10 Plus and Galaxy S10 are great phones, but two things held them back from getting our Editors' Choice award. The in-screen fingerprint reader has significant accuracy problems, which makes it annoying to use over the hundreds of times you unlock a phone in a week. And the camera tech falls behind Google and Huawei (more on both below.) Meanwhile, the Galaxy S10 5G is far too expensive at $1,300, 5G coverage is extremely limited and the chipset inside is already outdated. The Galaxy Fold's screen meltdown is a major black eye to Samsung, and a source of deep embarrassment.

But Samsung has another chance to attract buyers. Samsung often holds back its very best components and software rollout for the Note release. This model is typically the largest and most advanced of the year's Galaxy phones. Positioned as a device for power users, the Galaxy Note is also a bid against Apple's forthcoming iPhones as we head into the hypercompetitive holiday crush.

But impressing me -- and more importantly, prospective buyers -- is about more than battery size and storage capacity. I already know that the Galaxy Note 10 is going to have all the top-tier specs, from mega-battery to massive storage. To me, the Galaxy Note's real success will be defined by the details. Can Samsung catch up with competitors like Huawei and Google on camera prowess? Are there those elusive, but all-important intangibles that make a phone a pleasure to use every day?

Now playing: Watch this: So many more Samsung Galaxy Note 10 details leak

4:36

When you're playing at the very top level as Samsung does, small differences, for example, between an incredible low light photo and a merely good one, could change a buyer's mind. 

Here's what the Note 10 needs to have to be great.

Update the look, already

The Galaxy phone design is getting stale. Samsung likes to move around the camera placement to help differentiate each year's models, but the same curved sides we see on nearly every Galaxy phone, and that ultrareflective glossy backing, feel tired.

A refresh is long past due. For example, Huawei, Oppo, Vivo and OnePlus (the last three brands are connected by the same umbrella organization, BBK Electronics) have all trotted out exceptionally eye-catching designs with unctuous gradients and 3D chevron patterns. At long last, leaked images show that Samsung could embrace a similar look. The Galaxy Note 10 is also rumored to come in pink.

The screen needs to be as easy to use with a finger as it is with the stylus

I also hope that Samsung thinks about the curvature of the Note 10's screen. The dual curved edges are now standard on the higher-end Galaxy phones, and while I love the way they help immerse me in the world on the screen, the design also introduces a couple of problems. 

As bezels shrink and screens become truly edge-to-edge, the usable screen stretches all the way to the curve. I've had problems with phones like the Galaxy S10 Plus registering my finger when I tap the edge to place the cursor.

I also frequently use Samsung's edge panel software, a menu of shortcuts you can access from any screen. On curve-screen phones, that tab rests right on the screen bend, which makes it tricky to access with a swipe. 

While the precision of the Note's S Pen stylus might help, I find that I use my fingers at least half the time -- hopefully Samsung has found a happy medium between the radius of the screen curve and how far the active display extends.

samsung-galaxy-note-9-use-2

This area can be hard to swipe to with your finger.

Angela Lang/CNET

Give us an in-screen fingerprint reader that works every time

I was pumped to try out the Galaxy S10 Plus' in-screen fingerprint reader. So futuristic. So convenient to unlock the phone when it's lying on a desk, without having to pick it up to get to the rear-mounted sensor. My enthusiasm didn't last long.

The Galaxy S10 Plus' in-screen fingerprint reader  just doesn't work well. Even after enrolling my primary thumb twice to increase my odds of unlocking the phone on the first try, it routinely takes two, three, or even four attempts to actually unlock the Galaxy S10 Plus. I often wind up just typing in my 6-digit code in exasperation.

Multiple software updates from Samsung haven't helped, and the recommendation to delete all the prints and re-enroll them (for the third time) isn't a satisfying or practical solution.

galaxy-s10-macro-22

I want to love in-screen fingerprint readers so much.

Angela Lang/CNET

Better yet, give us face unlock

Google has already announced that the Pixel 4 will have secure face unlock like the iPhone X family of phones. That's to say, it'll use a dot projector to map your face. This has been a long time coming, but Samsung could have potentially gotten there first.

The Galaxy S10 lineup dropped the iris scanner that would have been secure enough for mobile payments. Samsung introduced that feature with the Galaxy Note 7, but pulling it in 2019 will mean its phones will fall behind the Pixel 4 when that phone launches -- Pixels usually arrive in October.  

Camera, camera, camera

When photos are the currency of your day, your phone had better have an industry-first camera. The Galaxy S10 Plus takes great shots. I get compliments all the time, even for images that don't apply filters. But good as they are, Samsung is no longer at the top of the game for photos or video.

Huawei's P30 Pro and Google's Pixel 3 take far better low light shots, using standalone modes that take a little longer, but bring out tremendous clarity and brightness, without blowing out the shot. 

galaxy-s10-plus-11

Huawei's P30 Pro takes exceptional low light pictures and photos with its optical zoom lens.

Angela Lang/CNET

And while the Galaxy S10 Plus has three lenses that make it easy to zoom in close or take a wide-angle photo, the P30 Pro and Oppo Reno with 10x zoom both get much closer from further away, with impressively crisp details. Samsung is rumored to be working on a 5x optical zoom of its own, but it's unlikely we'll see it in the Note 10.

The current rumors point to a main camera, telephoto lens and ultrawide angle lens on the Note 10 (just like the Galaxy S10 Plus), with a time-of-flight sensor (ToF) for the even-larger Note Plus. The ToF sensor could assist with portrait video as on the Galaxy S10 5G.

Most important to me is to see the quality of low-light shots improve, whether through a standalone app or in the phone's native camera itself. 

note9-screens-4

The Note 9's stylus got Bluetooth capability. What will the Note 10 bring?

Sarah Tew/CNET

Make the stylus relevant again

I like the S Pen stylus, the digital pen that gives the Note line its name. I mostly enjoy using it to take notes (it gives the typing fingers a break) and to navigate the phone's interface without smearing it up with finger grease. 

This year however, it'd be nice for Samsung to figure out a use case that people really care about. The S Pen is great for writing, taking precise screen shots and doodling, but I'm going to go out on a limb and assume that most people aren't drawing detailed images with precise shading. 

The Note 9 added Bluetooth capability, which lets you use the S Pen to take photos from afar, as a remote camera trigger. That's nice, but not entirely necessary. The current rumors suggest that the S Pen will gain more features that will allow you to use it for gesture navigation, a bit like the Pixel 4 features that Google just announced.

We've been burned by gesture navigation before. Years ago, Samsung even used a version that let you advance photos and songs by passing your hand across the screen. I wasn't a fan then, but times have changed, and perhaps this future -- if it emerges -- has too.

Samsung declined to comment.

We'll be live on the ground in New York covering the Galaxy Note launch. Stick with us for live impressions of the Galaxy Note 10.

$779

CNET may get a commission from retail offers.

Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnet.com/news/galaxy-note-10-samsung-has-one-more-chance-to-impress-me-this-year/

2019-08-03 09:30:01Z
52780343982522

Amazon's new opt-out keeps people from 'reviewing' your Alexa recordings - Engadget

Sponsored Links

An Amazon Echo Spot smart speaker photographed on a kitchen counter, taken on January 9, 2019. Future Publishing via Getty Images

Over the last few days Google and Apple have begun to address their use of real people that listen in on recordings to help improve voice AI like Assistant and Siri. For Amazon, these revelations surfaced months ago, and now it's added a toggle that people can use to opt out of potentially having their voice recordings and/or recorded message transcripts "manually reviewed" by people.

While Amazon has said that only a small sample of recordings are manually reviewed, people may not want to have someone listening in on what they were saying just because their speaker or remote thought it heard the wake word.

Bloomberg reported first on the new setting, which users can find on the Amazon website or in Alexa apps under the Alexa Privacy section. A new Privacy Hub for Alexa arrived in May, at the same time Amazon added the option to delete your voice history with a voice command. A spokesperson told the outlet that "We'll also be updating information we provide to customers to make our practices more clear."

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.engadget.com/2019/08/03/amazon-alexa-review-opt-out-privacy/

2019-08-03 07:58:47Z
52780344161674

Voice assistant companies abandon snooping practices after being found out - RT

Amazon has become the latest of the trio of tech giants to curb their secretive harvesting and processing of voice recordings via virtual assistants. The practice was rife with Google and Apple, as well.

Amazon announced on Friday that it would allow users of its smartphone assistance app Alexa to deny the company access to their private conversations. “We take customer privacy seriously and continuously review our practices and procedures,” the Amazon spokesperson told Bloomberg.

Also on rt.com Constant surveillance: How big tech’s household devices are SPYING on you

She said that Amazon would also be updating the app’s settings for it to include a disclaimer informing the customers that Amazon might subject their recordings to manual review if they don't opt out.

That practice reportedly saw Amazon employees listening to and transcribing some of the recordings, with the stated goal of improving the virtual assistant’s services. Amazon was not alone in spying on its customers while keeping them in the dark. Google and Apple were doing the same using Google Assistant and Siri, respectively.

It all came to an abrupt end after the clandestine practice was exposed in a series of groundbreaking revelations. Google came under intense scrutiny from a German watchdog after some 1,000 voice recordings were leaked to Dutch public broadcaster VRT NEWS last month. About one-tenth of recordings studied by VRT turned out to have been made in error, without a direct command by the customer. Caught red-handed, Google assured the regulator it would not be making any transcripts of speech data in the EU for at least the next three months.

Also on rt.com Siri ‘regularly’ records sex encounters, sends ‘countless’ private moments to Apple contractors

Apple said on Thursday that it was discontinuing the practice and initiating a “thorough review” as well. That was, however, not before an explosive Guardian report last week revealed that third-party contractors for Apple were able to listen to medical appointments, business deals, sexual intercourse and even what appeared to be criminal interactions while combing through the troves of data vacuumed by Siri.

Amazon was the last of the three to put the human reviews on pause, although Bloomberg reported back in April that “thousands” of Amazon employees could be snooping on customers’ “conversations” with Alexa with the ostensibly noble cause of upgrading the software.

Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.rt.com/news/465704-apple-amazon-alexa-spying/

2019-08-03 03:25:00Z
52780344161674

Jumat, 02 Agustus 2019

Best Buy’s weekend sale includes up to $500 off 12-inch MacBooks - Engadget

Sponsored Links

Roberto Machado Noa via Getty Images

Best Buy's three-day weekend sale includes a bunch of discounts on Apple and Amazon products, as well as cuts on laptops, TVs, smartwatches and smart home products. The sale runs through Sunday, and if you've been waiting to buy a new device, it's worth checking out.

Apple

iPhone XS and XS Max

The Apple discounts include up to $150 off iPhone XS and iPhone XS Max (with activation), $50 off select iPad Air models and $50 off Apple Watch Series 4 smartwatches. Plus, Best Buy is offering up to $500 off 8GB 12-inch MacBooks and $100 off the latest MacBook Air model.

Other laptop deals include up to $360 off select Microsoft Surface devices -- prices start as low as $599. Lenovo laptops start at $199, and you can save up to $200 on select Windows laptops.

Amazon

Amazon Echo Dot

There are a handful of Amazon products on sale, too. Amazon Echo devices are discounted up to 50 percent with some models going for as little as $14.99. You can save between $25 and $100 on Amazon Fire TV devices. Amazon tablets start at $29.99, and Fire TV Edition TVs start at $79.00, a $70 savings.

You'll get a free Echo Dot if you spend $200 or more in smart home products, or if you buy a discounted Ring video doorbell. Amazon Kindle e-readers are on sale, as are Beats Solo³ Wireless Headphones in black. There are plenty of TV discounts to pick from, as well, like a $700 cut on the Samsung 82-inch Q6F Series smart TV.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.engadget.com/2019/08/02/best-buy-weekend-sale-buyers-guide/

2019-08-02 21:48:09Z
52780344320451