Kamis, 05 September 2019

Garmin Venu with AMOLED Display: Everything You Ever Wanted to Know - DC Rainmaker

DSC_6477

I suppose one could simply say that the Garmin Venu was simply just a Vivoactive 4 with a really beautiful vibrant display, but then you’d skip reading over the remaining few thousand words and photos of this post. And nobody would want that, despite how precisely true those words were.

So instead, we’ll step back a bit and explain what the Venu is from a feature standpoint. I’ll show you its extremely strong lineage to the Vivoactive 4 (and the Vivoactive 3 of yesteryear), and show you that despite having an AMOLED display, it still has an always-on screen if you want it. So now there’s no required decision between pretty screen and always-on. Though, in some ways, there still is. And I’ll explain how these days on the Vivoactive/Venu lineup, music comes standard. As does a pile of new features related to other workout types like yoga & pilates with animated step by step workout move instructions, 24×7 respiration rate tracking, estimated sweat loss and finally hydration tracking.

So with all that, let’s get straight into the newness. Note that I have had a unit for the last couple weeks. And normally at this point I’d be doing an in-depth review, but simply put this product isn’t ready to ship. So since it’s not ready yet – I’ll wait for final firmware and hope to complete an in-depth review sometime in September.

What’s new:

DSC_6539

As you’ve probably gathered by now, the Venu is a progression of the Vivoactive lineup. It and the Vivoactive 4 share virtually every feature, with the only differentiating aspects of the Venu are those that are specifically display driven. So such things like higher quality animations and better quality watch faces. In discussing the features with Garmin, there are no non-display associated features that are in Venu that aren’t in Vivoactive 4, or vice versa.

The other thing to note is that previously there were separate editions of the Vivoactive lineup – one for music (e.g. Vivoactive 3 Music), and one for non-music (Vivoactive 3), now that’s all under a single umbrella with music – whether you have Venu or Vivoactive 4. On the flip-side, you now have two different sized units, and things cost more. The pricing is as follows:

US Pricing:
Venu: $399
Vivoactive 4/4S US Pricing: $349

EU Pricing:
Venu: €349 & €379 depending on bezels/buttons
Vivoactive 4S: €279 & €299 depending on bezels/buttons
Vivoactive 4: €299 & €329 depending on bezels/buttons

With that, let’s talk all the new offerings in relation to the past model – the Vivoactive 3:

– Music now standard: Including Spotify, Amazon Music, Deezer, and iHeartRadio
– Venu features 1.2” AMOLED display: Super vibrant, lots of colors
– Venu also adds ‘always-on’ mode despite AMOLED display
– Added ambient light sensor tied to new display
– Added new ‘Live’ Watch faces with small animations
– Added secondary button to side: Used for lap, back, menu access
– Added hydration tracking to manually track liquid intake with widget and app
– Added Estimated Sweat Loss post-workout
– Added Respiration Rate for all-day and sleep metrics (and certain workout types)
– Added Breathwork Exercises (way different than simple breathing stress features)
– Added Workout Animation functionality: For Strength, Cardio, Yoga, Pilates
– Added new Yoga and Pilates Built-in workouts: Includes step by step animations
– Added ability to design Yoga workouts in Garmin Connect: Complete with step by step pose animations
– Added ability to design Pilates workouts in Garmin Connect: Complete with step by step animations
– Added PulseOx for 24×7 blood oxygen tracking
– Revamped health stat widget akin to latest Fenix/Forerunner models
– Switched to Sony GPS chipset like remainder of Garmin 2019 unit lineup
– Switched to Garmin Elevate V3 optical HR sensor
– Connect IQ Developers will have access to create live watch faces
– Battery life at 5 days standby, and 6 hours of GPS+Music

As you can see, the vast majority of new features on the watch are far less focused on the swim/bike/run athlete that’s more common in Garmin’s Forerunner and Fenix lineup, and instead focused on a bit more of the lifestyle athlete that may be more varied in their day to day activity – which to be fair, was always the strength/target of the Vivoactive lineup, as this is within that family.

For those not familiar with the Vivoactive lineup, here’s all the baseline features found on both the Venu & Vivoactive 4:

– GPS tracking of activities (no reliance on phone)
– Workout tracking of range of sports including running, cycling, pool swimming, skiing, golf, gym and many more (full list down below)
– Structured workout support via downloadable workouts
– Quick on the fly intervals
– Training calendar support
– Optical heart rate sensor in watch
– 24×7 tracking of steps, stairs, calories, and distance
– Smartphone notifications from iOS/Android
– Garmin Pay for contactless payments

Ok, with all that out of the way, we’ll dive into the details. But first, one more thing:

Yes, the Garmin Fenix 6 Series & Forerunner 945 will get *all* of the new features noted above (except the display of course, and the live watch faces, which require the AMOLED display). For the Fenix 6 series, that update is slated for here in September, whereas for the Forerunner 945, that update is expected this fall.

Hands-On Details:

DSC_6534

For this post I’m mostly focusing on the new things. In my full in-depth review I’ll cover all the basics of using the watch that are more or less the same on every Garmin watch.

There’s a pretty strong chance that if you’re seeing a review on the Venu, it’s going to start with the watch face. That’s logical for two reasons, for of all – it’s by the prettiest thing on the watch, and second of all – it’s the first thing you see.  You’ll see it above in fact. And, if you check out my video, you’ll even get to see the nifty animation in the first 4 seconds of the video. Again, sexy animations sell. Or something like that.

And, there’s even more animations you can choose. They are technically called live watch faces, and you can lightly customize some of them:

DSC_6481

Keep in mind that live watch faces do eat into battery, as you might expect. There’s also more boring regular watch faces too.

And it’s about at this point that we should mention that I’d argue is Venu’s most important feature: The ability to turn on the always-on display. See, unlike watches from Apple and Samsung, Garmin joins Fitbit in perhaps a new trend of allowing these AMOLED displays to be left on the entire time. Of course, all of Garmin’s previous watches had always-on displays, but it’s not super common in the fancier display market.

With the Venu you can enable a low-power always-on watch face. Garmin claims about 2-3 days in this watch-face mode, but I think it’s actually a bit better than that depending on your nighttime settings:

DSC_6483

 DSC_6484

The reason the night settings matter is that when you’re within the ‘Do not disturb’ window at night (that you’ve configured), it’ll turn off the display entirely. This is a relatively smart move that saves battery life and also keeps the watch from becoming a constant flashlight. Here’s what that reduced watch face looks like (it’s slightly different for each one, and essentially keeps the time in the exact same spot as the original watch face):

DSC_6468

Next there are the buttons. There’s two of them now, versus the previous single button on the Vivoactive 3. It’s a nice touch, and really makes navigation so much more efficient. Folks coming from other Garmin watches will find it far more natural too:

DSC_6486

The upper right button is the start/stop/confirm/enter type button, whereas the lower right button acts like a back/lap/escape function. As well, obviously, the touch screen is how one would scroll up and down in the various menus. Again, works great.

Next we’ll get into some of the new health features, starting off first with the refreshed and consolidated health stats widget. This falls inline with other Garmin wearables and allows you to see things like heart rate, stress, body battery, and breathing rate in one quick glance:

DSC_6487

There’s also the brilliantly pretty looking heart rate graph. This is one of the few places in the watch that the AMOLED display really shines:

DSC_6488

You’ll find yourself a new hydration tracker widget. The way this works is that you define three ‘vessels’ (or cups, as you see them), and each of these are basically custom containers. So Cup #1 could be an 18oz bottle, cup #2 could be a 8oz cup, and cup #3 could be whatever else you want. Anytime you tap on that cup it automatically adds the appropriate amount of tracked liquid. Presumably it’s water, but perhaps you’re going for an extensive bar hoping adventure in Dublin and really want to know how many pints you’ve drank.

DSC_6489

All of this can be customized to metric instead of cups, by the way. And you can add water within Garmin Connect Mobile and it should merge together (right now that’s not working for me). The whole point of this is largely water tracking. For those trying to lose weight, one of the best ways to support that is drinking lots of water (for a variety of reasons that Google can help on). You’ll see your goal progress (as defined in settings on the app) around the outside, and a little animation when you achieve it.

DSC_6491

Garmin is approaching this feature much like the female menstrual tracking functionality they added the past spring in that it’s technically a Connect IQ widget that’s pre-loaded onto the Venu/Vivoactive 4 watches, but expect to see it expanded quickly.

2019-09-05 10.34.22

 2019-09-05 10.34.27 2019-09-05 10.34.34

Next there’s the new breathwork features. Now, unlike typical “slowly breath in and out” features we’ve seen on various watches, this is at an entirely different level of breathwork, often called mindful breathing. For you endurance athletes, think of this like the mother of all structured workouts. And in fact, you’ll find it under the workouts section:

DSC_6492

It’s here you can choose a specific breathing technique:

DSC_6494

DSC_6493

Once you’ve done that, it has all the steps listed. Seriously, some of these have repeats that list ‘35x’. Imagine if you had a track workout that said ‘Repeat 35 times’. Yikes.

DSC_6496

And then it’ll guide you through those steps, with the count-down timer around the edge.

DSC_6497

Now in certain activities you’ll also get the new respiration rate data. The new respiration rate feature does not require a heart rate strap, and is working constantly behind the scenes within the optical HR sensor to measure respiration rate (basically, breathing rate). You can see it on a dedicated widget on the watch, or via the health stats consolidated widget:

DSC_6487

And then also see all the trending data on Garmin Connect Mobile within the respiration rate section under health stats. You can slice and dice by day or longer periods, and also get awake and asleep averages:

2019-09-05 10.38.19

 2019-09-05 10.38.22

Beyond the above features, the vast majority of items you’ll see is virtually identical to previous Garmin watches. However, just more brilliant on Venu. For example, in the Spotify app, things just look prettier for the album covers:

DSC_6537

And as you saw earlier, for some of the widgets – like the heart rate ones, the trend lines are prettier. Even in the case where the overall widget structure hasn’t changed any, the colors are rendered far nicer than before. Here’s an example side by side of the weather widget on the Venu (left) and Vivoactive 4 (right). This really helps you see the display differences:

DSC_6500

And again, this time for that heart rate graph:

DSC_6503

Now finally, as I noted early on in this post, this isn’t a review. The reason it isn’t is because I haven’t compiled tons of workouts on it or worn it a bunch. It’s because at this juncture I don’t believe the firmware is final, and thus, it’s not representative of the units that will go to consumers. And in the case of both Venu and the Vivoactive 4, I’ve had a far rougher stability experience than I’d find acceptable at this point in time. I’m reasonably confident Garmin will be able to fix the issues I’ve stumbled on, but with announcement today, they aren’t yet fixed and thus I don’t believe they’re going to be shipping on this specific firmware version. Once I’ve got a final firmware version (the one they’re shipping to consumers with), then I’ll circle back with a typical full in-depth review. The point being, things will likely get better, but as always, it’s plausible they won’t.

Sports-Specific Details & Tests:

DSC_6506

While many of the new features are within the general aspects of the watch (like hydration), a huge pile of them are technically under sports (including the breathing features I talked about in the previous section). We’ll first look at these new features, and then from there dive into a quick accuracy check-up on some runs and such.

But first we’ve gotta talk animations. No, not like Dory and Nemo, but rather workout animations. Other watches, most notably Fitbit, have been doing this for years in the strength and core workout realm. But there have been plenty of others including Adidas and Polar that have tackled this as well. In Garmin’s case there are four workout types (Strength, Cardio, Yoga, Pilates) with some 41 different structured workouts between them. Within that there are small little animated peoples that you can see the exact steps of the workout.

Here, let me show you. Let’s pick a yoga workout, first by going to the sport menu and choosing Yoga:

DSC_6507

And then by swiping up to ‘Workouts’. It’s here that you’ve got a handful to choose from:

DSC_6509

Pick one of them, Sun Salutations in our case because it’s early morning right now and the sun is rising, and then press to view the 53 steps of the workout:

DSC_6510

You’ll see each step listed with the number of seconds next to it:

DSC_6511

If you tap on a given item, it’ll go ahead and show you a short animation of that action:

DSC_6512

But let’s go ahead and actually start the workout. When you do that it’ll walk you through each step, with a timer around the outer edge of the step, and the inside for the pose itself:

DSC_6515

You can swipe down for a timer that’ll show you a count-down, or just wait for it to buzz for the next step instruction, with it giving the name of the pose, and a pie-chart style countdown clock:

DSC_6515

You can see your heart rate on that clock page above, but also within a regular data field you can setup on a data page:

DSC_6517

In fact, you’ll notice both the stress and respiration rate data fields are actually available there – something new on Garmin wearables and specific to Yoga and Pilates. After you’ve finished the workout the summary screen will even list the poses, as well as your breathing rates:

2019-09-05 02.18.03

 2019-09-05 02.18.09

Now the overall poses/animations concepts are essentially the same whether you’re in yoga, Pilates, cardio, or strength. Obviously the specificS for each workout are different, but the way the Garmin unit works is the same. With strength training you’re also getting rep-specific information too.

However where it really starts to get interesting is that you can create your own workout with the animations from Garmin Connect/Garmin Connect Mobile:

2019-09-05 01.06.26

 2019-09-05 01.06.21 2019-09-05 01.05.46

Though, at present you don’t see the animations in Garmin Connect Mobile, but, they will show up once you get onto the device itself.

Let’s switch gears now. Taking a look at accuracy a bit, as well as the new sweat loss functions, and no better way to do that than an interval workout. In my case, I just did a manual workout, though the Venu does support structured workouts. To start a run I simply tap the upper right button once, and select run from the list:

DSC_6518

The GPS status and heart rate lock will also show up top:

DSC_6519

And if you wanted to execute a custom workout you’d just swipe from the bottom to access the workouts section:

DSC_6520

Then, it’s off I went on my run. In my case, just a couple of loops for a 5-6KM run after a long day driving to the convention halls. Nothing special. The display remains on the entire time I’m in my workout, so I don’t have to worry about waiting for it to illuminate when I glance at my wrist. Beyond that, it works just like any other Garmin watch in terms of showing you your running stats in customizable display pages:

DSC_6521

 DSC_6522

Let’s start though by looking at GPS accuracy. In this case I’ve got it slated up against the Garmin Fenix 6 Pro (with the HRM-DUAL chest strap), the Suunto 9 (paired to the Polar OH1 Plus optical HR armband), and the Vivoactive 4. Full data set:

image

At a high level it looks mostly good, but let’s zoom in on one of those sections that looks a bit wobbly:

image

You can see in that on the upper side there’s a unit (the Vivoactive 4) that’s doing some meandering into the convention halls. It did this on one pass, but not the secondary pass.

As for the Venu though, it matches the other tracks perfectly, and most notably – matched where I actually ran each time:

image

In general, this roughly matches what I see for the Venu and Vivoactive 4 in terms of GPS tracks. For the most part it’s good, but there’s also some runs where it’s a bit wobbly. Which I suppose is sorta the gist of things on the Sony chipset across the board, including Suunto and Polar (in fact, if you look at the linked data set, you’ll notice the Suunto 9 cuts a corner in the parking lot a bit too).

So what about heart rate accuracy? We’ll dig into that too – this compared against the HRM-DUAL chest strap and the Polar OH1 Plus optical HR sensor.

image

Ahh yes, the good ol’ classic evening fall run chest strap lack of connectivity (despite wetting it). It’s rare, but this night was more akin to a fall evening than a summer one, with cooler temps, and you can see that green line of the chest strap lagging. Though, from an optical heart rate standpoint all the units were very close on the intervals.

If we zoom into one, we do see the laggyness of the Venu & Vivoactive optical HR sensors though:

image

You can see the delay of both in comparison to the chest strap and Polar OH1, which more quickly adapt to the increased heart rate through each interval. But the delay isn’t horrible, at least compared to some. Keep in mind the graph directly above makes this look much longer than it really, so ensure to look at the timescale.

Again, in my full review I’ll go through more data sets and dive into all the nuances. But the above dataset is largely representative of what I’m seeing across the board for accuracy (both good and bad).

Finally, the last new feature to touch on is sweat loss. After you upload an activity to Garmin Connect it’ll show you the estimated sweat loss leveraging the known outside temperature, your weight, humidity, and general black magic. You can see for this short 27 minute run, it was 163ml of liquid (lower right hand corner of right screenshot):

2019-09-05 00.37.11

 2019-09-05 00.37.04

Ultimately, I suspect for most customers of the Vivoactive series units, this probably isn’t too much of a concern. But where it could be more interesting is on the higher end watches (which it’s coming too shortly) in terms of longer endurance workouts. At this point I haven’t done any weighing pre and post workout to validate this, but maybe if I get some nice warm days I will.

Wrap-Up:

DSC_6528

When Garmin first talked to me about the AMOLED display on the Venu, I was concerned they’d be leaving behind all the features that made a Garmin watch…well…a Garmin watch. The longer battery life and the always-on display. But it turns out they’ve balanced that pretty well. From the first day I’ve been using the Venu, I switched it into always-on display mode, and have been pretty good with it. Sure, it still turns off the display at night, but I can press a button to see the time pretty easily. All this while largely keeping battery life to the point where I only need to charge it 1-2 times a week depending on exact activity/usage.

All that said, I feel like Garmin sorta punted on actually taking advantage of the display. Sure, the 4 second long watch-face animation is cool, but realistically gets old after a few days. Beyond that – there’s virtually nothing else. Yes, there are the new workout animations – but those same animations are there on the new Vivoactive 4 too – just not as ‘bright’. There’s no other aspect of the watch that actually visually takes advantage of the display in any uniquely Venu way besides being crispier (which, to be fair is appreciated). As I noted early – the workout completion screen is probably the most glaring example of that.

Garmin’s watches are all about the workout, and yet its the lamest and most boring workout completion screen possible. No other Garmin device is as plain-Jane monochromatically boring at this one upon slamming that workout. No map outline like Garmin’s other new watches, and certainly not a full color map like the Apple Watch displays. No nifty brilliant display graphics to perhaps show heart rate zones or anything else. Anything, really…just anything would have been better.

But hopefully that’ll come in time. And I suppose for now they just need the watch to be a bit more stable first, before they start adding more features. Like I said at the start of this section – while I was concerned that the Venu and its swanky display might undermine Garmin’s reputation around battery life – that’s turned out not to be the case. And perhaps now I fall on the other side of the camp: Now it’s actually time to leverage it. Just a bit.

With that – thanks for reading, and stay tuned for an in-depth review down the road!

Heads up: You can pre-order both the Venu & Vivoactive 4 series via Clever Training. Doing so helps support the site here, and if you use the DCR/CT VIP program, you’ll get 10% back in points  you can use immediately, plus of course free US shipping. Thanks for the support!

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.dcrainmaker.com/2019/09/garmin-venu-with-amoled-display-everything-you-ever-wanted-to-know.html

2019-09-05 10:07:30Z
52780374121616

Puma’s first Wear OS smartwatch debuts in November for $275 - The Verge

Puma is launching its first smartwatch at IFA 2019 this week. The sports brand has teamed up with Fossil Group over the past 12 months to produce the wearable, which is powered by Wear OS and Qualcomm’s Snapdragon Wear 3100 chipset. The Puma smartwatch will include a 1.19-inch round AMOLED display, housed inside a cut-out nylon and aluminum 44mm case. Puma is naturally aiming this smartwatch at sports fans, and it will will be swimproof and lightweight at 0.06 pounds thanks to some cut outs on the side of the device to reduce its weight.

Puma’s smartwatch will include 4GB of storage and 512MB of RAM, which is the standard on most Wear OS watches. As this has the latest Snapdragon Wear 3100 chipset, Puma is promising more than 24 hours of battery life, but it will likely include the same complicated battery options as the Fossil Carlyle to really get the maximum battery life. As Puma’s smartwatch is powered by Wear OS you’ll get all the usual features like NFC payments, heart rate monitoring, fitness tracking, Google Assistant integration, and more. Puma is also supporting 16mm straps through a single prong strap buckle.

Puma has been experimenting with tech products in recent years, after it launched its first wirelessly connected self-lacing sneakers back in 2016. The company even rereleased its classic 1986 RS-Computer running shoe last year, complete with a USB port for charging and Bluetooth to connect the shoe to your phone. Earlier this year, Puma called on “tech-savvy” people to test its latest self-lacing shoes.

Puma is now planning to launch this new smartwatch in November, and it will be available in black, white, and a neon color for $275.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.theverge.com/2019/9/5/20850660/puma-smartwatch-features-pricing-wear-os-ifa-2019

2019-09-05 07:00:00Z
CAIiEJEt97HNUxDsk_IsIBKmukEqFwgEKg4IACoGCAow3O8nMMqOBjCd2ugF

Samsung Unveils Galaxy Fold Availability, Sort Of - AnandTech

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

  1. Samsung Unveils Galaxy Fold Availability, Sort Of  AnandTech
  2. Galaxy Fold: Official Introduction  Samsung
  3. This Android gaming phone is faster than the Note 10 and has 1TB of built-in storage  BGR
  4. Samsung to Launch Smartphone Meant to Make Blockchain Friendlier  The Wall Street Journal
  5. Samsung Galaxy Fold Now Available  Samsung Newsroom
  6. View full coverage on Google News

https://www.anandtech.com/show/14840/samsung-unveils-galaxy-fold-availability-date

2019-09-05 06:50:00Z
52780373785175

Rabu, 04 September 2019

Google can’t fix the Android update problem - The Verge

Android 10 is official and as of this writing it’s only available on a very small number of phones: Pixels and a few others. I’ll have a review up later today, but here’s a quick preview: it’s good, does a better job of protecting your privacy, but none of that matters if you can’t get a phone that runs it.

It’s difficult to maintain a sense of outrage over Android’s atrocious track record of providing upgrades to users year after year. We’re at the tenth version, after all, and the story on upgrades is the same today as it was a decade ago: first-party Google devices get updated quickly, everything else takes months or doesn’t get updated at all.

It’s not entirely fair to say nothing’s changed, though. Google has strong-armed manufacturers and carriers into letting it push critical security patches out more quickly. And starting with Android 10, a new initiative called “Project Mainline” will mean some of the plumbing inside Android can be updated directly via the Play Store.

That’s all important, but it’s not what people want. They want the big updates. Yet the Android ecosystem seems designed to keep major OS updates from getting prepped and delivered to users. That’s because it is. And since this situation hasn’t changed in a decade, there’s an incontrovertible conclusion to draw:

Google can’t fix it. No one can.

The state of Android updates is still dire

Take the recent report from Counterpoint Research, which points out that Nokia is far and away the best manufacturer when it comes to issuing major OS updates (after Google and Essential, both of which have far fewer devices to support). It includes this revealing chart, which plots out the percentage of a company’s “portfolio” adoption of Android 9 Pie in the year since it’s been released.

The thing that jumps out at you in this chart is how far ahead Nokia is! But this is actually a chart about failure. Here, let me highlight the most important quadrants:

Six months after release, only one manufacturer managed to get half of its portfolio updated, and only two managed over a quarter. A full year after release, only three managed to break the 50 percent mark! And the two most important and largest manufacturers — Samsung and Huawei — ended up at around 30 and 40 percent, respectively.

The lion’s share of phones sold during that period were running the latest version, but very few existing phones were upgraded to 9. There’s a more traditional metric for measuring the install base of Android we can look at, too, and the numbers are equally bleak. That would be Android’s own distribution chart:

Android Distribution, May 2019

As of May, Android 9 Pie had just barely managed to crack 10 percent. That’s much better than in years past, but still awful.

Google can’t fix it

This is all a result of how the Android ecosystem works.

There’s an open-source group, Android, that nominally is separate from Google and has all the major players participating in it. They’re all free to take the core of Android and do with it what they will (within reason). Some of them apply minor customizations that are easy to move from version to version, some do stuff that’s much harder. Sometimes (often), there is diminishing value for a manufacturer to go through all that effort, especially on older phones. And on top of all that, carriers usually want to verify all those updates won’t mess with their networks, slowing the process down further.

That’s the simple version of why Android updates take forever. The slightly more complicated version is that when I wrote that Android is “nominally” separate from Google, what I really meant was “Google controls Android.” It applies vastly more resources to developing it and chooses what features will be included in every version. It also controls — or at the very least can apply serious pressure on — the entire Android ecosystem because it operates the Play Store and makes the most popular Android apps (Chrome, Gmail, and the like).

In other words, Google has two levers it can pull to try to get Android updates pushed out into this fragmented ecosystem more quickly. There’s a technical lever and a policy lever.

Let’s start with the technical lever, which Google has been pulling very hard on. I’ve already mentioned Project Mainline and monthly security patches, but the more important piece is Project Treble. Treble kicked off in 2017 as a multiyear effort to change how Android is built — to make it more modular, basically, so that it would be easier for manufacturers to build stuff on top of it.

From a technical standpoint, Treble counts as pressure. Google is dictating how manufacturers use Android on their own phones, potentially limiting what customizations they’re able to make in the name of getting updates out more quickly.

It’s been two years, though, and you’d like to think we’d be seeing more dramatic effects from Treble. And it is true that more companies are doing a better job of creating those updates. I would also note that more of them are participating in Android betas. But Android moves slowly — and Treble isn’t a magic fix. It’s possible that Google could just change Android so that it has sole control of pushing out updates, but that seems really unlikely.

What I mean by the “policy” lever is the mix of prodding, cajoling, encouragement, shame, and begging that constitutes Google’s attempts to keep the Android ecosystem in line. It has helped, but as with the technical lever there’s only so much Google can do here.

I could imagine a world where Google required phones that have the Google Play Store and Google Apps to update their phones in a timely manner. Google has used that cudgel before for various other ends, and that didn’t go well. It’s gotten the company into hot water with the European Union and forced it to create a browser ballot and unbundle apps.

This is just how it is, until it isn’t

The “nuclear” option for Google is to just jam either of those levers all the way to the max. I don’t see that happening. It’s not (just) that Google is too timid, it’s that doing so could actually cause more fragmentation. The stricter and more strident Google becomes with Android and its Play Store policies, the more likely certain companies are to simply say “forget this” and fork Android, like what Amazon does with its Fire tablets. That would be a disaster for Google.

It didn’t have to be this way. Microsoft, for example, created an ecosystem of multiple manufacturers, yet nevertheless had a firmer hand when it came to updates for Windows Phone. Then again, it’s possible that was a tiny part of why it failed — manufacturers were much more incentivized to make Android phones because they could do more to differentiate (or monetize) their own phones.

Even Google itself has managed to fix this issue, albeit in situations with much lower stakes. Wear OS, Chrome OS, and the platform that runs Google’s smart speakers all get updates directly from Google. Parts of Android, such as Android Auto, can’t be altered by manufacturers and get updated through the Play Store. Android itself, though, was set up wrong from the start.

Some Googlers are probably not super angry about all this, as it gives Pixel phones a strong advantage over every other phone. But I wouldn’t go so far as to say that Google as a whole is happy about how Android updates work. I just don’t think that the company believes it can push either of those levers much further.

Then again, Google has very tentatively gone around some carriers to just implement RCS messaging on its own. Maybe there are creative ways to mix policy and code to fix this — but I can’t think of any, and I doubt all of the geniuses at Google can either. If they could, I think they would have by now, and we’d all be updating our phones to Android 10 today.

Oh well, there’s always Fuchsia to look forward to, maybe it will get updates.


More from The Verge

+ IFA 2019: the top announcements to expect from Europe’s biggest tech show

+ Huawei confirms Mate 30 will land on September 19th

There’s a real juxtaposition between Android 10’s release and Huawei’s confirmation that it’s going to continue to ship Android phones without knowing the details of what software it will be allowed to use. I don’t think enough people are aware of just how big a shake-up we are headed for if nothing changes.

+ Samsung Galaxy Note 10 review: smaller phone, bigger expectations

Well, I bet you Samsung is very aware. Dan Seifert reviews the smaller Galaxy Note 10. I also have been using this for the past week or so and I agree with everything Dan says here. It’s really not an upgrade over the Galaxy S10 unless you want that stylus. It’s great, but so is saving a few hundred dollars!

+ I’d avoid the first generation of this: Samsung’s cheaper, thinner, and “square” foldable reportedly coming next year

+ Sources say China used iPhone hacks to target Uighur Muslims | TechCrunch

That huge iPhone vulnerability we talked about last week was apparently targeting a specific group — and really you should not be breathing a sigh of relief. Instead, be even more chilled about the larger story of surveillance and oppression here. And if you use Android, well, that was targeted, too.

+ The frighteningly simple technique that hijacked Jack Dorsey’s Twitter account

We had some lols about Dorsey’s Twitter hack last week, but stop laughing and start checking your own security. Add a PIN to your phone number today. Also use 2FA. Also use a password manager so you don’t ever reuse passwords. Also, yeah, security is a pain, but it’s worth it. I usually set aside one Saturday every few months to just sit down, binge Netflix, and go through the section of 1Password that suggests password changes and watches for hacks.

+ Dani Deahl talks to theproducers of “Despacito” about how they use samples to create global hits. Watch it!

+ The man responsible for the BMW i8 is taking over as CEO of Faraday Future

Reading Sean O’Kane’s brief history of Faraday Future’s follies, I am shocked that anybody would sign on to be the CEO.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.theverge.com/2019/9/4/20847758/google-android-update-problem-pie-q-treble-mainline

2019-09-04 11:00:00Z
52780371953072