Jumat, 06 Desember 2019

Qualcomm's Snapdragon 865 chip won't build in 5G. Here's why it matters - CNET

snapdragon-summit

Qualcomm hosted its third-annual Snapdragon Tech Summit this week in Maui.

Shara Tibken/CNET

Chip giant Qualcomm has gathered hundreds of reporters and analysts in Hawaii this week to talk up its newest processors for mobile devices. Only a few minutes pass without some executive mentioning 5G and how popular the super-fast connectivity will be in 2020. 

But the biggest news of the show hasn't been the whiz bang features of Qualcomm's new chips, though, or how many 5G phones should ship over the next few years. Instead, what everyone has been talking about on the ground at the Snapdragon Tech Summit is something the new Snapdragon 865 processor for premium smartphones doesn't have: an integrated modem. 

Smartphones need a lot of components to operate, but two key parts that make a phone a phone are the application processor that acts as the brains of a device and a modem that connects it to a mobile network. The first 5G devices needed standalone modems that worked alongside the main computing processor. That was because 5G technology was so new, it was too difficult to combine it with the brains. Now, all chip makers are in the process of combining their modems with their application processors.

Now playing: Watch this: T-Mobile's new 5G network is here, we go hands on

4:14

But Qualcomm's decision to keep the modem separate marks a reversal of its one of its key strategies. The world's biggest wireless chipmaker has long been known for its ability to integrate its processors, known as a system on a chip, or SoC. The biggest benefits of SoCs are better battery life and lower cost. Instead of two chips taking up room in a phone, there's just one, resulting in thinner, sleeker phones or more room for bigger batteries. Having an integrated chip also enables device makers to quickly develop phones for essentially any 5G network in the world, and it makes 5G handsets cheaper for consumers.

"Qualcomm has made the argument for years that [integrated chips] are better and more power efficient," Technalysis Research analyst Bob O'Donnell said. "But all kinds of factors could have led them to determine that for now, on the high-end part with more components and capabilities, it's better to keep them separate."

Qualcomm has been talking about its first 5G integrated chip since February, when Samsung joined it on stage at the Mobile World Congress trade show in Barcelona to say it would be the first company to use that processor. Many market watchers, including this reporter, assumed it would be Qualcomm's highest-end chip to offer the technology first. We were wrong. 

Instead, it's Qualcomm's Snapdragon 765 and 765G processors for mid-range phones that come packed with 5G modems, the company said this week at its Snapdragon Tech Summit in Maui. The logical question: Why wouldn't Qualcomm pack 5G into its biggest and baddest chip?

The Snapdragon 865 "isn't integrated because it would not be the right technical solution, unless you compromise on the application processor or compromise on the modem," Qualcomm President Cristiano Amon said in an interview Tuesday. "We chose to compromise on none of them."

If Qualcomm didn't pare back the modem or the app processor features, he said, the resulting chip would be too big and too power hungry for high-end smartphones. 

"If try to do a chip without compromising on any of it, the chip is so big, we have issues in terms of cost, ability to scale and performance," Amon said. 

5G's first steps

5G promises to significantly boost the speed, coverage and responsiveness of wireless networks. It can run between 10 and 100 times faster than your typical cellular connection today, potentially changing what we can do out in the field. 

Last year's Snapdragon 855, which powered the first 5G phones, came embedded with Qualcomm's X24 gigabit LTE modem. To get a 5G connection, handset makers paired it with the company's X50 5G modem. Most handset makers opted to release one 5G variant and stick with 4G for the rest of their lineup.

"Every 5G product launched for any carrier in the world was an incremental product to what they already had for the year," Ryan Sullivan, vice president of product development and engineering at Sprint, said in an interview Tuesday. 

Samsung's main phones this year were the Galaxy S10 and Note 10 with 4G. The 5G models commanded premiums of $300 and $200, respectively, over the 4G versions. 

Eventually, "5G becomes part of the package for these devices," Sullivan said. "If it's a few hundred-dollar adder for 5G, it never becomes mass market." 

Whether that happens in 2020 is uncertain. Mark McDiarmid, T-Mobile senior vice president of radio network engineering and development, expects the premium for devices accessing the low-band variant of 5G will go away in about two to three years. "But mmWave is a different thing because I think it's going to take other countries deploying mmWave and consume mmWave devices to eliminate the cost premium there," he said in an interview Wednesday.

Snapdragon 865 

In a break from tradition, Qualcomm's premium tier Snapdragon 865 won't come with any embedded modem. It will only work when paired with Qualcomm's X55 modem, which connects to everything from 2G to 5G networks. It works on all different flavors of 5G from the slower but more reliable low-band spectrum to the ultra-fast but short-range millimeter wave frequency. 

"If you look at performance, we're No. 1 in all areas, sustained CPU, GPU [and so on]," Amon said. "We believe the uses cases [for high-end 5G smartphones] will demand it." (Reporters will conduct speed tests to verify those claims).

He noted that the battery life of devices using the Snapdragon 865 paired with the X55 will be much better than phones last year that combined the Snapdragon 855 with the X50 modem. It will be even better than 4G phones that last year that used only the Snapdragon 855 with its embedded X24 modem, he said. 

qualcomm-snapdragon-765-5g-mobile-platform-chip-front

Qualcomm's Snapdragon 765 chip is the first to integrate 5G with the brains of the phone. That helps battery life and makes devices cheaper. 

Qualcomm

Part of the rationale behind keeping the modem and application processor separate could be Qualcomm's partnership with Apple, Creative Strategies analyst Ben Bajarin said. Apple is one of the only handset companies in the world that doesn't have integrated modems in its phones. It makes the application processors that run its iPhones, but it relies on partners like Qualcomm and Intel for the modems to connect them to cellular networks.

Qualcomm also has launched a new 5G module system that combines its modem with the antennas needed to connect a phone to a network. That move makes it easier for companies to churn out 5G phones faster and lets companies without deep engineering know-how create new devices. HMD, which makes Nokia phones, is one company that will use Qualcomm's modules.

The strategy of keeping the 865 and modem separate "doesn't lock new customers into only having to use the full SoC," Bajarin said. "Serving Apple actually helps them serve new markets so it's win-win. I believe they could have integrated it but chose not to so they can develop the module strategy which is a good one."

Snapdragon 765

To get even better battery life and the benefits of integrated chips, though, handset makers will have turn to Qualcomm's new Snapdragon 765 or 765G (the "G" version is for gaming phones).

Handset makers using the integrated Snapdragon 765 get some premium features, but they're not quite as high end as in the 865. The 765's X52 modem reaches only 3.7Gbps download speeds versus 7.5Gbps in the x55 modem that pairs with the 865, and it can't run as many operations per second.  

"The difference [from the Snapdragon 865] is scaled-down version of features," Alex Katouzian, senior vice president and general manager of mobile at Qualcomm, said in an interview ahead of the summit.

He added that when shifting to 4G LTE a decade ago, Qualcomm didn't integrate the modem with the application processor in its high-end chip until the third generation. 

"The standard is new," Katouzian said. "We haven't had time to vet out different features for the modem to make it more optimized and smaller. What happens over the course of time is some features get used a lot more than others so we can figure out what to use and what not to use."

Stacking up with rivals 

Qualcomm, however, faces a pack of rivals -- Huawei, MediaTek and Samsung -- that have already unveiled their own integrated 5G processors. 

Huawei's Kirin 990 chip, announced at IFA in September, integrates 5G with the brains of the device for its own premium smartphones. MediaTek's new Dimensity 1000 5G-integrated chip also targets the high-end smartphone market, and it's the only one that boasts download speeds higher than Qualcomm's Snapdragon 765.

Samsung's 5G-integrated Exynos 980, unveiled in September, is aimed more at mid-range devices. 

Huawei's 990 chip can facilitate download speeds of 2.3Gbps and upload speeds of 1.25Gbps. In comparison, MediaTek's Dimensity 1000 boasts download speeds of up to 4.7Gbps and upload speeds of 2.6Gbps. Both have limitations on which bands they can tap into; they can't access the ultra-fast millimeter wave spectrum favored by Verizon.

"Our 5G technology goes head-to-head with anyone in the industry," MediaTek President Joe Chen said in a press release announcing the Dimensity 1000 last month. 

Amon, in a roundtable with reporters on Tuesday, disputed the claims by Qualcomm's rivals that they have the most powerful, efficient chips.

"There are some companies who rush into integration," Amon said. "A competitor in China … downgraded the capability of the modem as it went from discrete to integrated."

He didn't name the rival, but he likely was referring to Huawei. The Chinese company's earlier discrete 5G chip, the Balong 5000, could reach download speeds that topped out at 7.5Gbps when combining 5G with LTE. Its integrated Kirin 990 only works on the lower spectrum bands and has peak download speeds only half as fast as the Balong 5000.

"Everybody rushed to do an SoC, compromising the technology on the modem and the apps processor," Amon said in an interview with CNET. That included "companies who had everything to lead in the modem. … It's interesting that when everyone went that direction, we went the other direction."

We'll now have to see what that actually means for 2020's smartphones. 

CNET's Jessica Dolcourt contributed to this report. 

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiaGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmNuZXQuY29tL25ld3MvcXVhbGNvbW1zLXNuYXBkcmFnb24tODY1LWNoaXAtd29udC1jb21lLXdpdGgtNWctYnVpbHQtaW4taGVyZXMtd2h5LWl0LW1hdHRlcnMv0gEA?oc=5

2019-12-06 13:00:00Z
52780465936035

Samsung’s Galaxy S11 will reportedly feature its 108-megapixel camera - Engadget

Sponsored Links

Samsung Galaxy S11 renders @OnLeaks/91Mobiles

The leaks regarding Samsung's upcoming flagship phone, the Galaxy S11, are coming thick and fast. Last month we saw a reported render of the device, and earlier this week we heard it may be capable of capturing 8K video. Now, more rumors suggest that it'll feature considerable battery capacity and that the camera will be significantly upgraded in order to compete with the iPhone.

According to a report by Bloomberg, Samsung is overhauling its camera to include its 108-megapixel sensor, which was unveiled in August and is already being used in devices like the Xiaomi CC9 Pro. The S11 will also host an extra three sensors on the rear, including one lens for capturing ultrawide angles and one with 5x optical zoom. In addition, to assist in augmented reality functions and taking portrait photos, the device is reported to include a "Time of Flight" sensor which bounces infrared light off a subject to help with depth detection.

Information regarding the potential battery of the Galaxy S11 comes from SamMobile, which reports that we can expect the device to sport a 5000 mAh battery. For comparison, the iPhone 11 Pro Max has a nearly 4000 mAh battery. The improved battery life of the Galaxy S10+ was considered a big plus by our readers, so it seems that Samsung is doubling down on more power to make its new device last all day and beyond.

Samsung has not commented publicly on these features, so they remain unconfirmed. The company typically announces new Galaxy phones in February each year, so we can expect to hear more about the S11 in early 2020.

Source: Bloomberg
Coverage: SamMobile
In this article: galaxy s11, gear, leaks, mobile, rumors, samsung
All products recommended by Engadget are selected by our editorial team, independent of our parent company. Some of our stories include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, we may earn an affiliate commission.
Comment
Comments
Share
161 Shares
Share
Tweet
Share
Save

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiR2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmVuZ2FkZ2V0LmNvbS8yMDE5LzEyLzA2L3NhbXN1bmctY2FtZXJhLW92ZXJoYXVsLWdhbGF4eS1zMTEv0gFLaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZW5nYWRnZXQuY29tL2FtcC8yMDE5LzEyLzA2L3NhbXN1bmctY2FtZXJhLW92ZXJoYXVsLWdhbGF4eS1zMTEv?oc=5

2019-12-06 11:43:16Z
52780463166165

Samsung’s Galaxy S11 will reportedly feature its 108-megapixel camera - Engadget

Sponsored Links

Samsung Galaxy S11 renders @OnLeaks/91Mobiles

The leaks regarding Samsung's upcoming flagship phone, the Galaxy S11, are coming thick and fast. Last month we saw a reported render of the device, and earlier this week we heard it may be capable of capturing 8K video. Now, more rumors suggest that it'll feature considerable battery capacity and that the camera will be significantly upgraded in order to compete with the iPhone.

According to a report by Bloomberg, Samsung is overhauling its camera to include its 108-megapixel sensor, which was unveiled in August and is already being used in devices like the Xiaomi CC9 Pro. The S11 will also host an extra three sensors on the rear, including one lens for capturing ultrawide angles and one with 5x optical zoom. In addition, to assist in augmented reality functions and taking portrait photos, the device is reported to include a "Time of Flight" sensor which bounces infrared light off a subject to help with depth detection.

Information regarding the potential battery of the Galaxy S11 comes from SamMobile, which reports that we can expect the device to sport a 5000 mAh battery. For comparison, the iPhone 11 Pro Max has a nearly 4000 mAh battery. The improved battery life of the Galaxy S10+ was considered a big plus by our readers, so it seems that Samsung is doubling down on more power to make its new device last all day and beyond.

Samsung has not commented publicly on these features, so they remain unconfirmed. The company typically announces new Galaxy phones in February each year, so we can expect to hear more about the S11 in early 2020.

Source: Bloomberg
Coverage: SamMobile
In this article: galaxy s11, gear, leaks, mobile, rumors, samsung
All products recommended by Engadget are selected by our editorial team, independent of our parent company. Some of our stories include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, we may earn an affiliate commission.
Comment
Comments
Share
Tweet
Share
Save

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiR2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmVuZ2FkZ2V0LmNvbS8yMDE5LzEyLzA2L3NhbXN1bmctY2FtZXJhLW92ZXJoYXVsLWdhbGF4eS1zMTEv0gFLaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZW5nYWRnZXQuY29tL2FtcC8yMDE5LzEyLzA2L3NhbXN1bmctY2FtZXJhLW92ZXJoYXVsLWdhbGF4eS1zMTEv?oc=5

2019-12-06 11:10:47Z
52780463166165

Kamis, 05 Desember 2019

Apple says its ultra wideband technology is why newer iPhones appear to share location data, even when the setting is disabled - TechCrunch

This week, security reporter Brian Krebs asked why the newest iPhone 11 Pro appeared to be sending out a user’s location even when the user disabled Location Services in their phone’s settings, in conflict with Apple’s privacy policy and the express wishes of the user.

Apple told Krebs it was “expected behavior” and that there were no security implications, but failed to say assuage fears of a location-leaking bug.

Krebs came to a logical conclusion. “It seems they are saying their phones have some system services that query your location regardless of whether one has disabled this setting individually for all apps and iOS system services,” he wrote.

He wasn’t wrong. The technology giant now has an explanation — two days after Krebs’ article went up and more than half a day after the company declined to comment on the matter.

Newer iPhones — including the iPhone 11 Pro which Krebs used — come with ultra wideband technology, which Apple says gives its newer handsets “spatial awareness” to understand where other ultra wideband devices are located. Apple only advertises one such use for this technology — users wirelessly sharing files over AirDrop — but it’s believed it may become part of the company’s highly anticipated upcoming “tag”-locating feature, which has yet to be announced.

“Ultra wideband technology is an industry standard technology and is subject to international regulatory requirements that require it to be turned off in certain locations,” an Apple spokesperson told TechCrunch. “iOS uses Location Services to help determine if iPhone is in these prohibited locations in order to disable ultra wideband and comply with regulations.”

“The management of ultra wideband compliance and its use of location data is done entirely on the device and Apple is not collecting user location data,” the spokesperson said.

That seems to back up what experts have discerned so far. Will Strafach, chief executive at Guardian Firewall and iOS security expert, said in a tweet that his analysis showed there was “no evidence” that any location data is sent to a remote server.

Apple said it will provide a new dedicated toggle option for the feature in an upcoming iOS update.

But Strafach, like many others, questioned why Apple hadn’t explained the situation better to begin with.

Apple could have said something days ago, immediately squashing rumors with a simple explanation. But it didn’t. That absence of explanation only welcomed speculation. Credit to Krebs for reporting the matter. But Apple’s delayed response made this a far bigger issue than it ever had to be.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiTmh0dHBzOi8vdGVjaGNydW5jaC5jb20vMjAxOS8xMi8wNS9hcHBsZS11bHRyYS13aWRlYmFuZC1uZXdlci1pcGhvbmVzLWxvY2F0aW9uL9IBUmh0dHBzOi8vdGVjaGNydW5jaC5jb20vMjAxOS8xMi8wNS9hcHBsZS11bHRyYS13aWRlYmFuZC1uZXdlci1pcGhvbmVzLWxvY2F0aW9uL2FtcC8?oc=5

2019-12-05 17:31:29Z
52780461564251

From AirPower to Zune, a decade of tech and companies that died - CNET

dead-10
This story is part of The 2010s: A Decade in Review, a series on the memes, people, products, movies and so much more that have influenced the 2010s.

While they inspire a bit of nostalgia -- and frequently skeuomorphism -- yesteryear's gadgets are the compost of technology, the old crap out of which new products grow. As part of the natural product cycle, it's hard to describe them as really "gone." 

decade-in-review-bug

Sometimes they just feel dead because a company doesn't update or even mention them for a while. The Apple iPad Mini, Mac Mini, MacBook Air, Mac Pro and iPod were on our endangered list for years before Apple surprised us with upgrades to all. On the other hand, the company's AirPort router line and Time Capsule backup drive also were on a long death watch until they finally landed on Apple's vintage and obsolete product list this year. You just never know. 

Other times, new products absorb their predecessors. As they became ever more powerful over the past decade, phones killed devices like the MP3 player by slowly, but inexorably subsuming the capabilities of single-purpose gadgets like the Microsoft Zune player and the Flip camcorder. While we might mourn our old friends, we get over the loss pretty quickly. 

A variation on that theme are technologies that fail as consumer products but become absorbed into commercial devices. Microsoft's Kinect sensing camera and mic array moved from Xbox gaming to the enterprise in 2017, for instance, as Azure Kinect. I don't really consider that "dead."

Now playing: Watch this: Was the VW Beetle the most important object of the 20th...

9:36

There are a lot more categories that the phone currently endangers like GPS devices, point-and-shoot cameras and voice recorders (you may think they're gone, but they're not). And then there's the analog headphone jack, which Apple effectively put on the endangered list with the iPhone 7's Lightning port (also, still not quite gone). As it turned out, the computer in our pocket was a killer. 

Even so, the biggest surprise of my 10-year trudge through Google Search wasn't what we'd lost, but what's still plugging along each year on my endangered list. Blockbuster Video. Curved TVs. MySpace. Snap Spectacles. Android tablets. They may be sharply diminished or struggling and assumed to be gone, but they're not quite dead yet.

VW Beetle Final Edition

The last of the VW Beetles rolling in 2018.

Volkswagen

Isn't it iconic?

There are some companies, products and technologies that simply reflect the tech zeitgeist of an era, regardless of their lifespan, actual impact or how we felt about them. They need little explanation.

But some of the dead I feel compelled to eulogize. Or speak ill of. 

Old companies never die, they just become patent portfolios

OnLive was one of the pioneers in cloud gaming when it launched in 2010, but arguably failed simply because it arrived before its time. Game libraries were too small, we hadn't yet become inured to (or fatigued by) subscription pricing, there were a lot more problems with network bandwidth and stability (though they remain issues even today for new platforms like Google Stadia and Microsoft xCloud), and gaming was primarily for the hardcore who prefer the better performance on a local system. 

By 2012 it had hit too many financial bumps to remain independent or continue as originally envisioned, and in 2015, Sony bought it and immediately shut it down. As a service it wasn't viable, but its technology patents were extremely valuable for Sony's nascent PlayStation Now platform, which at the time streamed games from the cloud to its consoles.

kodakapology.png

Event Kodak's imaging patents, which it originally believed were worth billions, eventually only netted it $525 million.

Some eCards

Sometimes companies remain but their souls die. In 2012, struggling Kodak sold or shut down every product that arguably made it Kodak -- the film, sensor, camera, scanner, kiosk and inkjet printer businesses -- culminating in the sale of its entire imaging patent portfolio. (Fun fact: It sold its OLED business to LG in 2009.) The company's still around today, and has been slowly bringing back its film, thanks to a small old-school photography market, but it's nothing like what Kodak was when this century began.

Palm traveled a similar road. Technically, you could also argue the once-dominant pioneer in in handheld computing is still alive and well, but it's nothing like it was in its heyday. After 18 years of success it had to sell itself to HP in 2010, which stopped producing the hallmark Palm and WebOS devices in 2011 and licensed the WebOS source code and documentation, and sold the patents, to LG in 2013. That was followed by the transfer of the Palm trademark to TCL in 2014.

And occasionally, the first time you see a new product you just know it's never going to be viable as a saleable item -- but that it's a great proof-of-concept of technologies that will eventually end up in other products, whether via the sale of the companies' patents to a bigger entity or reverse engineering by another player. That's how I felt when I saw Lytro's brilliant light-field technology in its awful first camera in 2011; Google acquired some of the brains behind that in 2018. 

Ch-ch-ch-changes

Some technologies die out no matter how good they are simply because they can't keep up with changing market demands, like plasma TV. It was the reigning quality champ beginning in the mid-1990s through the mid-2010sPanasonic getting out of the business in 2013 tolled the death knell. Despite diehard fans, as 4K grew in popularity, plasma's inability to scale resolution beyond HD held it back, along with the constraints imposed by the bulb-for-every-pixel backlight that allowed its deep blacks, a problem rising competitor OLED didn't face.

Long, drawn-out deaths

Some companies and products die so gradually that, by the time they turn off the electricity we thought they were already long gone.

Take VHS tapes and VCRs. A combination of digital video recording and streaming displaced them eons ago, but it wasn't until as late as 2016 that the last VCR manufacturer closed shop -- and Betamax, which had lost the game to VHS as far back as the 1980s, didn't completely disappear until 2015

DSC_0018.JPG

Windows Phone 7 and Zune app, circa 2010. Both doomed.

Bonnie Cha/CNET

One of the last relics of the early web -- when we still prefaced it with "worldwide" -- community GeoCities was sold to Yahoo in 1999, but just three years later it faced the insurmountable pressures of a changing web.  In 2009, Yahoo officially closed it, but the last remnant of it didn't disappear until March 2019. Ditto for Yahoo groups, which are slated to go to that great discussion board in the sky by the end of this year.

Windows Phone, Microsoft's 2010 attempt to create a single operating system across desktop and mobile devices, and which eventually morphed into Windows 10 Mobile, also had some diehard fans. But it was quickly squeezed out by Android and iOS, and it dropped from the public consciousness long before Microsoft formally pulled the plug in 2017.

The army of Meanwhiles and Neverweres

Apple, with its much-hyped-but-never-shipped AirPower wireless charging pad is my Could've Been King of the decade. Google's Project Ara modular phone and Theranos' unproven blood-testing tech are other rivals for the position, but while highly newsworthy, neither felt as eagerly anticipated by the tech world as the AirPower. 

"Never shipped" is a crown usually donned by crowdfunding campaigns, frequently part of take-the-money-and-run stories, such as Lily (the selfie drone), Ossic X/SonicVR (3D audio headphones), Goji Smart Lock and the iBackPack (a connected backpack).

At AirPower's announcement, Apple showed AirPods connecting to an iPhone when dropped on the same AirPower charger.

GIF by Alexandra Able/CNET

There's also a special subset of insanely stupid product ideas that somehow get funded but either never ship or sputter out a couple miles above the launchpad, leaving the rest of us with our schadenfreude to keep us warm. The Kuvee Wi-Fi wine bottle and Juicero Wi-Fi juicer are two recent standouts. (Unfortunately, there's always a few that sneak through and make it to production, like Licki. Because sticking a pacifier-like tongue in your mouth to groom a cat is just insane.) 

An honorary member of this club is Microsoft's Kin, a phone-ish attempt to appeal to a made-up demographic of "lifecasters" (young adults really into social networking). While the product line actually launched in April 2010, it lasted less than three months before Microsoft officially called a halt to it in June.

msft-kin-11_540x360.jpg

Microsoft Kin One and Kin Two didn't even make it to three months old.

James Martin/CNET

Killed by Google

Google gets a section of its own, thanks to its (and parent company Alphabet's) notorious reputation for sinking a lot of money and resources into big, hype-tastic products and projects for which it then loses interest in, like a kid with ADD. Google's tagline should be "don't get too attached." There's even a web site devoted to the Google graveyard.

On one hand, you've got to admire Alphabet's ability to cut its losses and start from scratch when others refuse to admit defeat. But the practice has come back to bite it. As recently as this month, lifespan has become a not-unwarranted concern some people have about its cloud-gaming venture, Google Stadia. 

From 2010 through 2015, Google scooped up a lot of little companies to beef up its social network presence, including Orkut and Meebo, which it subsequently shut down as part of its list of social media failures. Its own Google Plus, which launched in 2011, finally succumbed in 2019 after eight years of the company foisting it on users of its web apps, especially Gmail. Though Google Plus did have its fans, for the most part it went unloved and unlamented, and leaving a big security hole in our lives.   

But Google's also killed a lot of products that had real fanbases, like Inbox by Gmail in 2019 (I still miss it), Picasa and Panoramio in 2016 and Reader in 2013. 

It was all just a dream

Google's assassinated products are sometimes a part of categorical executions, as well. Take low-cost VR: Google and Samsung attempted to deliver cheaper solutions than full-on headsets like the Oculus Rift and Quest, HTC Vive and others; essentially, letting you roll your own headsets by popping your phone into a visor. Just this year, Samsung's Gear VR, Google's Daydream platform and its own Cardboard headset fell victim to the increasing physical complexity of flagship phones and a largely uninterested reception by the public.

vrcomparison03.jpg

2015: Samsung Gear VR and Google Cardboard: Two phone-based virtual reality options available now.

2019: No more.

Sarah Tew/CNET

Sometimes it's a dream of a different type. MoviePass was an idea everyone loved in theory: all-you-can-eat subscriptions for movie-going. But the company had to continually change its pricing, tiers and policies in search of a viable business strategy, alienating almost all its subscribers, until it finally reached The End in September 2019.

Every decade is littered with the corpses of startups with the dream of taking on a big competitor or blazing a trail. Path launched in 2010 with the idea of a more intimate, private, mobile-based social network to compete with the Facebook juggernaut, and in 2013 overvalued itself at $1 billion; by 2015, it had sold its app to Daum Kakao, a South Korean messaging company, and yielded to the inevitable in September 2018. Other notable startup dreams that died over the past 10 years include Friendster (June 2015) and Fab (2015).

Then there are 3D TVs, which sounded so good on paper and still have some admirers. The last two manufacturers, LG and Sony, caved to its flaws in 2017

Death by lawyers

Intellectual property protection has been a big deal for tech startups over the past 30 years, whether you believe it  an economically essential defense, legal overreach to insulate obsolete business models, or somewhere on the continuum between. The 2010s continued the litigating-out-of-existence trend that took down Napster, Grokster, RealDVD and a host of others during the previous decade. Some which fell during the last 10 years include LimeWire peer-to-peer file sharing, Grooveshark streaming music on demand and Aereo's unbundled over-the-air-TV streaming; nonprofit streaming TV startup Locast is currently on the legal defensive. (Disclosure: CBS, the parent company of CNET, was a plaintiff in some of these litigations.)

In addition to IP challenges, some hit legal walls because they couldn't see the anonymous writing on them. YikYak, for instance, was frequently charged with facilitating cyberbullying and harassment, complicated by its use of proximity detection

The forgotten

Ten years is a long time in tech, and there's so much detritus we've left on the side of by the road -- and in our landfills -- that I've inevitably missed some of your big faves. Or least faves. So feel free to fire off your lists of dearly departed gadgets in the comments. And don't forget to check out the people we've lostthe scandalsthe worst developments and more of the decade in tech .

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiWWh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LmNuZXQuY29tL25ld3MvZnJvbS1haXJwb3dlci10by16dW5lLWEtZGVjYWRlLW9mLXRlY2gtYW5kLWNvbXBhbmllcy10aGF0LWRpZWQv0gFkaHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuY25ldC5jb20vZ29vZ2xlLWFtcC9uZXdzL2Zyb20tYWlycG93ZXItdG8tenVuZS1hLWRlY2FkZS1vZi10ZWNoLWFuZC1jb21wYW5pZXMtdGhhdC1kaWVkLw?oc=5

2019-12-05 13:00:00Z
CAIiEJxtJvjkqR_y4PGGU2RZ5OIqEwgEKgwIACoFCAow4GowoAgwkRo

Craigslist, founded 24 years ago, is finally getting its first official app - The Verge

There’s something about the brutal simplicity of Craigslist that’s always suggested an admirable caution. But even then you’d have to admit the company has been slow to get on the app game. Now, more than a decade after apps became A Thing with the App Store’s launch, Craigslist has finally has its own, available for iOS and in beta on Android.

The iOS app at least follows the principles of Craigslist’s web offering, nicely replicating its clean and unpretentious functionality. You can browse listings in various categories, from jobs to items to houses; search for what you’re looking for; place your own ads; create alerts for listings; and contact sellers without ever having to sign up for an account.

Some may be disappointed that nothing’s changed for Craigslist’s first apps. But for many others that fact will be exactly the point.

At least one review on the iOS App Store notes that the company has fallen behind newer rivals, and its failure to offer security features like an escrow service or verifications for rental listings are telling. Others are just happy there’s finally an official app that will crowd out the copycats trying to take advantage of Craigslist’s recognizable name.

All you can really say is: the apps are basic, but so is Craigslist. Let’s see how much longer its simplicity stays relevant.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiY2h0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnRoZXZlcmdlLmNvbS8yMDE5LzEyLzUvMjA5OTY3MzEvY3JhaWdzbGlzdC1hcHAtb2ZmaWNpYWwtbGF1bmNoZWQtaW9zLWFuZHJvaWQtcGxheS1zdG9yZdIBcGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnRoZXZlcmdlLmNvbS9wbGF0Zm9ybS9hbXAvMjAxOS8xMi81LzIwOTk2NzMxL2NyYWlnc2xpc3QtYXBwLW9mZmljaWFsLWxhdW5jaGVkLWlvcy1hbmRyb2lkLXBsYXktc3RvcmU?oc=5

2019-12-05 11:26:17Z
CAIiEEqt0SuC02XRVFjX4cFMopkqFwgEKg4IACoGCAow3O8nMMqOBjDf1ugF

Google Recorder now compatible with older Pixels, downloadable through Play Store for some - 9to5Google

One of the most impressive features debuted alongside the Pixel 4 and Pixel 4 XL was a Recorder app that works completely offline to transcribe and search text. It’s officially still exclusive to the 2019 devices, but Google said it plans to make Recorder available for older Pixel phones. The first step towards that is now here.

Google released an update for the Recorder app earlier today. This version (1.1.283481728) can be sideloaded on older phones (h/t Artem Russakovskii) and successfully used without any crashes.

In our testing, the latest release works on a Pixel 2 and Pixel 3 running the December security patch — which introduced other functionality like Themes, updated Pixel Launcher, and Android 10 gesture support for third-party launchers. The Pixel 3a is likely now also compatible with Recorder.

Interestingly, I — as a Pixel 4 owner — can fresh install Google Recorder on those two older Pixel devices from the Play Store. The listing appears in Play search results (and through direct linking) presumably because it’s already associated with my Google Account/Play library from having the 2019 phone.

However, that is not the case for other current Pixel 3 owners on the team where a “Your device isn’t compatible with this version” warning still appears.

Regardless, this is a step towards Google’s “plan to roll [the Recorder] to older Pixel devices in a future software update.” That announcement was made in late October, and could just see Google tweak availability on the Play Store. In the meantime, you can download and install from APK Mirror now.

More about Google Pixel:

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.


Check out 9to5Google on YouTube for more news:

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://news.google.com/__i/rss/rd/articles/CBMiP2h0dHBzOi8vOXRvNWdvb2dsZS5jb20vMjAxOS8xMi8wNC9nb29nbGUtcmVjb3JkZXItb2xkZXItcGl4ZWxzL9IBQ2h0dHBzOi8vOXRvNWdvb2dsZS5jb20vMjAxOS8xMi8wNC9nb29nbGUtcmVjb3JkZXItb2xkZXItcGl4ZWxzL2FtcC8?oc=5

2019-12-05 06:05:00Z
52780460259511