Selasa, 30 April 2019

Energizer’s 18,000mAh phone-battery monster is an Indiegogo flop - The Verge

The Energizer name figured prominently at Mobile World Congress this year, courtesy of a prototype Android smartphone that was about an inch thick, consisting mostly of a giant battery. The 18,000mAh Energizer Power Max P18K Pop was a preview of something Avenir Telecom, the company licensing the battery brand’s name for use on phones, wanted to mass-produce and bring to the market by this summer. After that successful MWC debut, the P18K Pop turned up on Indiegogo with an early-bird price of $549, a promised delivery window of October 2019, and an optimistic goal of $1.2 million in total funding.

Today, Avenir’s Indiegogo campaign for the Energizer battery-with-a-phone-in-it concluded with a whimper, having accumulated a scant $15,005 in pledged support. Since the campaign fell 99 percent short of achieving its original goal, and all funding was conditional on it being fully funded, the entire exercise seems to have been for naught. Then again, given how many companies use crowdfunding platforms primarily as marketing levers, there’s a reasonable argument to be made that Avenir Telecom maybe never really believed it would be able to go beyond the prototype stage with its P18K Pop.

The calculus for the company can be read as simply as “let’s do something to grab people’s attention, throw it on Indiegogo with an unlikely funding goal, and only in the event that people go wild over it should we build anything.” People did find the Energizer-branded brick-phone-battery hybrid fun and exciting to gawk at, but when it came time to put money toward turning it into a real product, enthusiasm was evidently far less abundant.

Ah well, at least now we know there are limits to our desires for ever bigger batteries.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.theverge.com/circuitbreaker/2019/4/30/18522236/energizer-huge-battery-phone-p18k-pro-indiegogo-price-fail

2019-04-30 08:01:03Z
CAIiEGvIJ6U0GcC51_BovGHROcIqFwgEKg4IACoGCAow3O8nMMqOBjDc064F

Senin, 29 April 2019

Apple, Enough With the Slow-Ass Chargers - Gizmodo

Photo: Gizmodo

You may not know it, but your iPhone—if an iPhone 8 or later—is capable of much faster charging. The only problem is, Apple doesn’t give you the stuff necessary for it. But a new rumor claims that could be changing, and it should.

Apple’s phones are currently shipped with a standard 5W charging cube. If you’ve purchased an iPhone in the last few years, you know what this looks like. But Apple states that iPhone 8 or later can be fast-charged with a USB-C to Lightning cable and any one of the following power adapters: 18W, 29W, 30W, 61W, or 87W USB-C Power Adapter. But these will cost you extra, and that’s frustrating! (However, it is standard for Apple.)

Advertisement

According to a report from the Japanese site Mac Otakara, however, Apple will include the goods necessary for fast charging—a USB-C to Lightning cable and the USB-C 18W adapter—with its next series of iPhones. To this I say: Give us the dang juice, Apple!

When Gizmodo tested the charging capabilities offered by the various power adapters that aren’t included with an iPhone for which you could be paying close to a grand, the difference was clear. Anything above a 12-watt charger delivered far faster charging for an iPhone 8 or later, though the results varied slightly for later models.

Here’s how Apple’s chargers stacked against one another (keeping in mind that its 18-watt option wasn’t available in late 2017 when we ran the tests):

Advertisement

No one wants to spend upwards of $50 for the accompanying tools necessary to make their iPhone do the thing that the company says it can do—particularly because we’re already asked to do that with other arguably necessary accessories. Plus, as the Verge noted, Apple shipping with these upgraded charging accessories would also allow users to plug their iPhones directly into their laptops without needing a separate cord.

Apple did not immediately return a request for comment, but we’ll update this article if we hear back.

Apple is one of the most innovative companies on the planet. It’s time to let its technology speak for itself without requiring its customers to purchase a bunch of add-ons necessary to let a phone perform the way its meant to.

Advertisement

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://gizmodo.com/apple-enough-with-the-slow-ass-chargers-1834396427

2019-04-29 21:59:00Z
52780279496283

Spotify Hits 100 Million Subscribers and Still Isn’t Making Money - Rolling Stone

On the near-anniversary of its first quarterly earnings report as a public company in 2018, Spotify has good news to share. In its earnings report for the first quarter of 2019 Monday, the company said that it reached 217 million monthly active users around the world — 100 million of whom are paying for the premium subscription tier.

Those numbers are a relief for investors as well as music-industry executives who’d doubted that Spotify could significantly increase consumer interest in its $9.99/month premium tier; its free ad-supported tier, they worried, would deter growth in the more money-making subscription arena.

But Spotify’s Q1 2019 figures show 26 percent year-over-year growth in monthly active users and 32 percent year-over-year growth in paying subscribers, suggesting that more users are willing to pay a monthly fee for music. Across the board, results “were largely positive with most metrics outperforming our expectations,” the company said in its note to shareholders.

Spotify has gone to great lengths over the past year to ramp up both its premium tier and overall popularity. Among a myriad of expansion efforts, the Swedish music-streaming service has teamed up with Samsung, the biggest smartphone maker in the world; launched in India with a budding user base of around 2 million there; and amplified its partnership with Hulu to offer free video-streaming from the service to all Spotify Premium users. Its new 100 million figure far outpaces Apple Music’s reported 50 million paying subscribers.

Spotify also spent a significant portion of its earnings report discussing its podcasting ambitions, noting it’s working on a new podcast advertising model. While still unprofitable because of the high royalty rates it pays out to rights-holders, Spotify lost €142 million ($160 million) in Q1 2019 as opposed to €169 million ($190 million) in Q1 2018. It expects to end the year with between 222 million and 228 million total users, 107 million to 110 million of them on the premium tier.

Spotify financial update – April 29, 2019

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/spotify-hits-100-million-subscribers-and-still-isnt-making-money-828502/

2019-04-29 14:58:00Z
52780280470257

Spotify Tops Estimates With 100 Million Paid Users - Yahoo Finance

Spotify Tops Estimates With 100 Million Paid Users

(Bloomberg) -- Spotify has reached 100 million paid subscribers, a first for any online music service, adding more customers in the latest quarter than analysts expected and boosting confidence the company has lots of room to grow.

Spotify Technology SA took on 4 million customers in the quarter, compared with the 3.3 million forecast by analysts. But its first-quarter loss was 79 cents a share, wider than the 41-cent loss analysts expected. After a brief rise, the stock fell as much as 2 percent to $135.50 in New York trading.

Competition from Apple Inc., Amazon.com Inc. and YouTube has done little to slow Spotify’s growth around the world, and the company has relied on its independence from some of the world’s largest companies to its advantage. It has boosted its customer base through promotional deals with Hulu, Samsung and even Alphabet Inc.’s Google (YouTube’s parent company).

“The music industry market is way bigger than most people realized,” Chief Executive Officer Daniel Ek said on a call with analysts.

The company forecast it would add a further 7 million to 10 million subscribers in the current quarter. While Spotify has amassed its current user base thanks to music, the company has acquired three podcasting companies in the past few months to drive subscriber growth through other mediums.

Spotify spent about $400 million to buy Gimlet Media Inc., Anchor and Parcast, hoping that podcasting will turn the company into the world’s top audio platform and reduce its reliance on music. Record labels collect the majority of its annual sales.

Label Payments

Payments to labels are a big reason the Swedish company is still losing a lot of money. Spotify attributed the first-quarter loss largely to higher costs for stock options and restricted stock units, thanks to its share-price gains. Gross margin was 24.7 percent, above the high end of the company’s guidance range.

Spotify is in the midst of negotiations with the world’s three largest music companies -- Universal, Sony and Warner. Executives have cautioned investors not to expect those deals to reduce its costs, but still sounded enthusiastic about concluding talks. “We’re feeling good about the progress we’re making,” Chief Financial Officer Barry McCarthy said in an interview.

Though Spotify’s premium subscribers topped expectations, monthly active users fell just short at 217 million. Spotify was projected to report about 218.3 million total users and 99.3 million premium subscribers, according to estimates compiled by Bloomberg News.

Expansion into new territories, such as India, will sustain growth in free users for years to come, the company said. Spotify has added 2 million customers since expanding to India earlier this year, and McCarthy said Latin America and Asia are growing quickly. Spotify offers a free service with advertisements and limited use, selling a full buffet of on-demand songs and playlists without ads for a fee.

Its growth in recent years has buoyed the entire music industry. Record sales have climbed four years in a row, and surpassed $19 billion in 2018. Shares of the music streaming service have rallied 22 percent so far this year, compared with a 17 percent gain in the S&P 500.

--With assistance from Karen Lin.

To contact the reporter on this story: Lucas Shaw in Los Angeles at lshaw31@bloomberg.net

To contact the editors responsible for this story: Nick Turner at nturner7@bloomberg.net, John J. Edwards III, David Welch

For more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com

©2019 Bloomberg L.P.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://finance.yahoo.com/news/spotify-hits-100-million-paid-101530938.html

2019-04-29 14:12:00Z
52780280470257

Apple accused of anti-competitive practices after removing rival apps - CNBC

Apple chief design officer Jony Ive (L) and Apple CEO Tim Cook inspect the new iPhone XR during an Apple special event at the Steve Jobs Theatre on September 12, 2018 in Cupertino, California.

Justin Sullivan | Getty Images News | Getty Images

Apple said on Sunday that it removed several parental control apps from its App Store platform because they put user privacy and security at risk.

The removed apps, according to Apple, were abusing a kind of technology intended for company-owned work phones called Mobile Device Management (MDM), which can give an app developer access to information including user location, browsing history and what photos and videos have been taken with the camera.

The statement was made in response to a New York Times story that suggested Apple had pulled the apps for anti-competitive reasons.

The response, published on Apple's website, is another example of how the company is walking a tightrope given its control of the App Store and its safety and security priorities along with new accusations from politicians and rivals that Apple uses its power over the software distribution platform to favor its own apps.

Apple said in its statement that it "is incredibly risky—and a clear violation of App Store policies—for a private, consumer-focused app business to install MDM control over a customer's device."

Most of the apps highlighted by the Times report enabled parents to limit the amount of the time they and their children spent on their iPhones and Android devices, and two developers have filed a complaint with the European Union's competition office.

Apple continued: "Contrary to what The New York Times reported over the weekend, this isn't a matter of competition. It's a matter of security."

One of Apple's App Store guidelines says that "Apps should use APIs and frameworks for their intended purposes and indicate that integration in their app description." Using MDM to track and limit phone use isn't the intended purpose of MDM, Apple says.

Apple released software in 2018 called Screen Time that enables users to track which apps they use the most and restrict access to distracting apps. It's installed by default on iPhones. "I think it has become clear to all of us that some of us are spending too much time on our devices," Apple CEO Tim Cook said last summer.

In the weeks after Screen Time was released, 11 of the 17 most-downloaded screen-time and parental control apps were removed and restricted, according to the Times.

Presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren said earlier this year that the fact that some apps Apple develops competes with developers on the App Store is possibly anticompetitive. Spotify, which competes with Apple Music, has also accused Apple of anticompetitive practices.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.cnbc.com/2019/04/29/apple-removed-parental-control-apps-over-security-and-privacy-concerns.html

2019-04-29 13:17:31Z
52780278690000

Apple Parental Control App Controversy: Here's What Is Going On - Tom's Guide

[unable to retrieve full-text content]

Apple Parental Control App Controversy: Here's What Is Going On  Tom's Guide

Apple admits it has crippled or banned many third-party parental-control and screen-time-limiting apps due to user 'privacy concerns.'

View full coverage on Google News
https://www.tomsguide.com/us/apple-parental-controls-screen-time,news-29950.html

2019-04-29 12:33:45Z
CBMiUGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnRvbXNndWlkZS5jb20vdXMvYXBwbGUtcGFyZW50YWwtY29udHJvbHMtc2NyZWVuLXRpbWUsbmV3cy0yOTk1MC5odG1s0gFPaHR0cDovL2FtcC50b21zZ3VpZGUuY29tL3VzL2FwcGxlLXBhcmVudGFsLWNvbnRyb2xzLXNjcmVlbi10aW1lLG5ld3MtMjk5NTAuaHRtbA

Samsung imagines a wraparound smartphone display - Engadget

Sponsored Links

WIPO/Samsung

If that whole folding smartphone thing doesn't work out, Samsung has lot of other ideas cooking. It recently received patent approval for a continuous display that covers the front, while folding around the top and part of the rear of the phone, as spotted by Let's Go Digital. That would make for some interesting applications, like letting subjects see how they look before you take a photo or showing live language translations on the rear display.

You could activate which part of the continuous display (front or back) to use by hovering your hand or a stylus S Pen over it. Rather than being stuck with a basic camera, you'd use the superior rear camera for selfies thanks to the rear display. The language translation part is a particularly interesting idea, as it would let each party speak while the other sees the translation -- all without the need to flip the screen around.

Samsung continuous screen patent

Because it folds around the device, there could also be a display on the top that shows notifications, messages and so on. That way, it could function like a glorified pager, letting you see messages without even removing the phone from your pocket. If you wanted to reply, you could simply pull out the phone drag the message from the top to the front display.

Samsung is actually a bit late to this party, as the recently released Vivo NEX Dual Display phone already has a rear screen, although it uses two separate displays, not a continuous one. Vivo has even advanced the posing feature pretty far, introducing a Pose Director that can give your subject pose suggestions from an image library.

However, the translation app is an interesting idea, and a phone like this might look pretty cool thanks to the seamless display that wraps around the top. There's a chance we might see something like this, but don't bet any money on it -- patents often turn out to be duds.

Let's block ads! (Why?)


https://www.engadget.com/2019/04/29/samsung-smartphone-wraparound-display/

2019-04-29 10:47:57Z
CAIiENGinb7ZVbCqfjMDfoRRL70qGAgEKg8IACoHCAowwOjjAjDp3xswicOyAw